Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial resolution of the tendency-oriented perimetry algorithm.

Andrew J Anderson1

  • 1Discoveries in Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA. ajanderson@hotmail.com

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|April 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Spatial suppression of motion and motion segmentation in peripheral vision.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Discovery of Bis-Acyl Hydrazides as Potent and Bioavailable MTA-Cooperative PRMT5 Inhibitors: A Case Study of Leveraging the Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effect.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

Neural decoding of autobiographical mental image features with a general semantic model.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Seeing a sunset: Exploring the joy of vision, in healthy eyes and ocular disease.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

A Common Representational Code for Event and Object Concepts in the Brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Impact of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits on Ellipsoid Zone-Related Thickness Metrics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Optic Nerves From SMOX-Deficient Mice Identifies Regulators of Neuroinflammation and Axonal Damage in Optic Neuritis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Aflibercept and Faricimab Equipotently Restore Endothelial Barrier Function.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Spatial Decomposition of Longitudinal RNFL Maps Reveals Distinct Modes of Glaucomatous Progression With Structure-Function and Genetic Signatures.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

The CXXC1-IGFBP6 Axis Maintains Corneal Epithelial Differentiation via H3K4me3-Dependent Transcriptional Activation.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Archetypal Visual Field Analysis of Patients With Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in Relation to Visual Recovery.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) has unusual spatial characteristics. This visual field testing strategy struggles to accurately estimate defect extent and sensitivity, particularly for smaller visual field defects.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) is a novel visual field testing strategy.
  • TOP aims for rapid visual field sensitivity estimation using linear interpolation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the spatial resolution characteristics of the TOP algorithm.
  • To evaluate TOP's accuracy in estimating visual field defects.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulations were employed to model visual fields with realistic variability.
  • Simulated visual field defects of varying sizes and depths were introduced.
  • The TOP algorithm estimated visual field sensitivity, and global indices (MD, LV) were calculated.

Main Results:

  • TOP tended to overestimate sensitivity for small defects (1-2 points).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mean Deviation (MD) was predicted adequately, but Loss Variance (LV) was underestimated.
  • TOP accurately predicted larger defects (9 points) but reduced sensitivity estimates in surrounding normal areas.

    • Conclusions:

    • The TOP procedure exhibits spatial characteristics that limit its accuracy.
    • TOP is not suitable for precise estimation of visual field defect extent and sensitivity.