Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Population categorization and cancer statistics.

Otis W Brawley1

  • 1Winship Cancer Institute Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Otis_Brawley@emoryhealthcare.org

Cancer Metastasis Reviews
|April 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

American Cancer Society's Report on the Status of Cancer Disparities in the United States, 2025.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·2025
Same author

Establishing a Protocol to Increase Racial/Ethnic Under-Represented Minority Enrollment on an Active Radiation Oncology Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

American journal of clinical oncology·2025
Same author

Remote Monitoring and Data Collection for Decentralized Clinical Trials.

JAMA network open·2024
Same author

Health Care Policy and Disparities in Health.

Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)·2023
Same author

Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes and How to Resolve Them.

Hematology/oncology clinics of North America·2022
Same author

On the Potential for Optimizing Colorectal Screening Outcomes.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2022
Same journal

HER2 assessment in urothelial carcinoma: standardization challenges and the path forward.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same journal

Resolving translational challenges in cancer biology through yeast experimental evolution.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same journal

Spheroids and organoids to study long noncoding RNAs in cancer: how they could replace animal models.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same journal

Strategies and successes of smoking cessation methods in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same journal

The Hippo signaling pathway in pediatric brain tumors: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same journal

Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer brain and leptomeningeal metastases: mechanistic insights and therapeutic progress.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
See all related articles

Studying cancer rates across diverse populations reveals insights into disease risk. Factors like diet, socioeconomic status, and genetics influence cancer incidence and mortality, benefiting all at risk.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Racial/ethnic classifications in US government data are sociopolitical, not scientific.
  • Cancer incidence and mortality are influenced by extrinsic factors like diet, socioeconomic status, and culture.
  • Gene prevalence can vary significantly between different populations or racial groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of studying cancer rates in diverse populations.
  • To underscore the influence of sociopolitical and extrinsic factors on cancer incidence and mortality.
  • To emphasize the role of genetic variations in cancer risk across populations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of cancer incidence and mortality data across different racial/ethnic groups.
  • Examination of extrinsic factors (diet, socioeconomic status, cultural factors) correlating with race/ethnicity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of genetic variations and gene prevalence within specific populations.

    • Main Results:

    • Sociopolitical definitions of race/ethnicity impact data interpretation.
    • Extrinsic factors significantly correlate with observed cancer rates.
    • Genetic variations contribute to differential disease prevalence among populations.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding cancer rates in diverse populations is crucial for public health.
    • Sociopolitical and genetic factors interplay in cancer risk.
    • Further research into population-specific cancer determinants is warranted.