[Analysis of various gastric carcinoma classification systems, through the prism of a study performed at Craiova IV...

The aim of this work is to analyze the various gastric carcinoma classification systems, trying, at the same time, to establish connections between the anatomopathologic evolutionary and prognostic aspects. CASE MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed on a series of 66 patients who undergone excision surgery for gastric carcinoma. The study material are 31 cases of gastric cancer diagnosed in Clinical Hospital CFR Craiova, and another 35 cases diagnosed at the "I.V. Babeş" Pathology and Medical Genetics Institute in Bucharest. The excised pieces underwent anatomopathological investigation using histopathological, histochemical and immunohistochemical methods.

From the macroscopic point of view, the most common tumor pattern was Bormann 2 ulcerovegetative, targeting patients over 60 years of age. In what the invasion level is concerned, most carcinomas were sanctioned at the time when the tumor was invading the serous fluid (pT3) or even the perigastric tissue (pT4). The microscopic criteria was approached by us using Goseky's method, the most common being Goseky stages 2 and 4, in equal rations. The distribution of cases depending on the OMS differentiation degree, shows a preeminence of low differentiated carcinomas (G3).

The abundance of classification methods in gastric cancer shows the complexity of the matter but none of the classifications is perfect.