Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decomposing Black-White differences in child maltreatment.

Sheila D Ards1, Samuel L Myers, Chanjin Chung

  • 1Benedict College, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Child Maltreatment
|May 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in nutrition-related health outcomes following a minimum wage increase.

SSM - population health·2026
Same author

Early results of a natural experiment evaluating the effects of a local minimum wage policy on the diet-related health of low-wage workers, 2018-2020.

Public health nutrition·2023
Same author

The Labor Market for Lifeguards and Hispanic Drowning Rates.

Hispanic economic outlook·2022
Same author

Occupational Segregation And Hypertension Inequity: The Implication Of The Inverse Hazard Law Among Healthcare Workers.

Journal of economics, race, and policy·2022
Same author

Modeling <i>Salmonella</i> Spread in Broiler Production: Identifying Determinants and Control Strategies.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2020
Same author

The Economic Benefits of Reducing Racial Disparities in Health: The Case of Minnesota.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2019

Conflicting data on child maltreatment shows racial disparities in allegations, reports, and substantiation. Disaggregating by welfare status reveals that racial gaps in child abuse are influenced by both allegations and substantiation, depending on the case type.

Area of Science:

  • Child welfare research
  • Sociology of race and inequality
  • Public health and child safety

Background:

  • Conflicting data exists regarding the racial composition of maltreated populations between the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) and the National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS).
  • NCANDS data suggests Black children are overrepresented in reported and substantiated child abuse and neglect cases.
  • NIS data indicates no apparent overrepresentation of children of color in maltreatment statistics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reconcile conflicting findings on racial disparities in child maltreatment data.
  • To analyze the components of maltreatment rates (allegation, report, substantiation) across different racial groups.
  • To investigate the impact of welfare status on racial disparities in child maltreatment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Re-analyzing National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS) data to create approximate measures comparable to National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) maltreatment rates.
  • Disaggregating maltreatment data into allegation, report, and substantiation components.
  • Analyzing racial disparities in maltreatment rates, both overall and when disaggregated by welfare status (welfare vs. nonwelfare cases).

Main Results:

  • Without disaggregating by welfare status, racial differences in allegations account for most of the racial gap in official child maltreatment.
  • When disaggregated by welfare status, racial differences in substantiation explain approximately half of the Black-White gap in maltreatment among welfare cases.
  • Among nonwelfare cases, racial differences in allegations account for about half of the racial gap in official child maltreatment.

Conclusions:

  • Racial disparities in child maltreatment reporting and substantiation are complex and influenced by welfare status.
  • Allegations play a significant role in the racial gap for nonwelfare cases, while substantiation is a key factor for welfare cases.
  • Further research is needed to understand the systemic factors contributing to these disparities and to develop targeted interventions.