Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
Published on: August 14, 2019
Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography
M Uhl1, J Kromeier, L-B Zimmerhackl
1Department of Pediatric Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Germany. uhl@mrs1.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Insights
Voiding urosonography (VUS) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) show comparable accuracy for diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children when performed simultaneously. VUS is a reliable method for reflux verification or exclusion.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Urology
Background:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common condition in children.
- Accurate diagnosis of VUR is crucial for appropriate management and prevention of renal damage.
- Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the traditional gold standard, but involves radiation exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (VUS) and fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG).
- To evaluate both imaging modalities when performed simultaneously in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- A total of 24 children underwent simultaneous VCUG and VUS for reflux examination.
- Radiographic contrast and ultrasound contrast agents were administered sequentially via transurethral catheterization.
- Fluoroscopy and ultrasound were performed concurrently, with imaging of contralateral sides.
Main Results:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was detected in 19 of 47 kidney-ureter-units (KUUs).
- Both VCUG and VUS detected reflux in 16 KUUs; VCUG alone detected reflux in 3 cases (all grade 1).
- VUS demonstrated 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity compared to VCUG as the reference standard.
Conclusions:
- Simultaneous performance allows for dependable comparison between VUS and VCUG.
- Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (VUS) is confirmed as a reliable imaging technique for VUR diagnosis in children.
- VUS offers a valuable alternative or adjunct to VCUG for reflux evaluation.
Purpose:
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (VUS) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) during simultaneous performance of both examinations.
Material And Methods:
A total of 24 children, 16 girls and 8 boys, with a mean age of 3.5 years referred for reflux examination were recruited for the study. After transurethral bladder catheterization, radiographic contrast medium, followed directly by the US contrast medium, were administered. Fluoroscopic VCUG and VUS were carried out concurrently in the same patient. When 1 kidney was scanned by ultrasound, fluoroscopy was performed on the contralateral side.
Results:
In 19 of the 47 kidney-ureter-units (KUU) vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was detected. In 16 units the reflux was detected by both VCUG and VUS. In 3 KUUs the reflux was detected only at VCUG. All 3 cases were grade 1. Taking the VCUG as the reference standard, VUS had 84% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% and 90% positive and negative predictive values, respectively.
Conclusion:
A dependable comparison could be achieved by performing VCUG and VUS at the same time and under the same conditions. It reconfirmed that VUS is reliable in the exclusion or verification of reflux.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

