A case-control follow-up study for disease-specific mortality
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
1Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 602 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6021, USA. mjoffe@cceb.upenn.edu
Abstract:
Case-control studies often rely on subjects to report their own screening or exposure information: this information is often obtained from cases after the event of interest has occurred. This is problematic for mortality outcomes, because dead subjects cannot report the desired information. To avoid this problem, Weiss and Lazovich (1996, American Journal of Epidemiology 143, 319-322) proposed obtaining exposure or screening information from potential cases, i.e., subjects diagnosed with disease, at the time of disease diagnosis, and also from a referent series. The design is best viewed as a new scheme for sampling from a cohort. I review estimation of the effects of time-varying screening or exposure in cohort studies, using a new factorization. I then show how this factorization, together with ignorability assumptions, allows valid estimation from these new designs. Even when the sampling fraction of nondiseased subjects is unknown, causal risk ratios are estimable if diagnosis is rare in the cohort. I illustrate and compare conventional and new methods with data from the Health Insurance Plan study.
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups