Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in measuring enzyme activity by reaction-rate methods.

A R Henderson

    Clinical Biochemistry
    |June 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Trojan computer.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Use of Shewart's technique.

    Lancet (London, England)·2001
    Same author

    Solomon Carter Fuller, M.D. (1872-1953): American pioneer in Alzheimer's disease research.

    Journal of the history of the neurosciences·2001
    Same author

    An overview of quality control practices in Ontario with particular reference to cholesterol analysis.

    Clinical biochemistry·1999
    Same author

    The use of biochemical markers in ischaemic heart disease: prefactory remarks.

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·1998
    Same author

    The use of biochemical markers in ischaemic heart disease: summary of the roundtable and extrapolations.

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·1998
    Same journal

    Analytical outlier rates for Roche fifth generation cardiac troponin T stat using biotin sensitive and insensitive reagent lots.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluation of hemoglobin interference thresholds for chemical urinalysis panels.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Integrated genomic and biochemical diagnosis of a novel homozygous start-loss variant in AKR1D1 associated with neonatal cholestasis.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Agreement between POC glucose meters and blood gas analyzers varies across ICU patient populations.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    Same journal

    Response to the letter to the editor: From variability to value: Advancing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring toward decision-grade practice through commutability-informed external quality assessment and uncertainty-aware reporting.

    Clinical biochemistry·2026
    See all related articles

    Clinical enzymology employs reaction-rate and two-point assays, often on separate analyzers. A new multi-point analyzer may offer advantages, but all methods have inherent and system-related errors.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical enzymology
    • Analytical chemistry
    • Biochemical analysis

    Background:

    • Clinical enzymology utilizes reaction-rate and two-point assays.
    • These assays are typically performed on distinct analytical instruments.
    • A novel multi-point analyzer has recently emerged in the field.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To systematically review error sources in clinical enzymology assays.
    • To compare inherent methodological errors with analytical system errors.
    • To evaluate the implications of different analyzer types on assay accuracy.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of established reaction-rate and two-point assay methodologies.
    • Systematic analysis of potential errors within these assays.
    • Consideration of errors introduced by the analytical instrumentation.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Reaction-rate and two-point assays possess inherent methodological limitations.
    • Significant errors can arise from the analytical systems used.
    • The introduction of multi-point analyzers presents a new consideration for error analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding and mitigating errors in clinical enzymology assays is crucial.
    • Both assay methodology and analytical systems contribute to potential inaccuracies.
    • Further investigation into multi-point analyzers and their associated error profiles is warranted.