Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules
Published on: May 19, 2023
Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection
Jane P Ko1, Henry Rusinek, David P Naidich
1Thoracic Division, Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA. jane.ko@med.nyu.edu
Purpose:
To assess the effect of using a lossy Joint Photographic Experts Group standard for wavelet image compression, JPEG2000, on pulmonary nodule detection at low-dose computed tomography (CT).
Materials And Methods:
One hundred sets of lung CT data ("cases") were compressed to 30:1, 20:1, and 10:1 levels by using a wavelet-based JPEG2000 method, resulting in 400 test cases. Each case consisted of nine 1.25-mm sections that had been obtained with 20-40 mAs. Four thoracic radiologists independently interpreted the test case images. Performance was measured by using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az) and conventional sensitivity and specificity analyses.
Results:
There were 51 cases with and 49 without lung nodules. Az values were 0.984, 0.988, 0.972, 0.921, respectively, for original and 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 compressed images. Az values decreased significantly at 30:1 (P =.014) but not at 10:1 compression, with a trend toward significant decrease at 20:1 (P =.051). Specificity values were unaffected by compression (>98.0% at all compression levels). Sensitivity values were 86.3% (176 of 204 test cases with nodules), 77.9% (159 of 204 cases), 76.5% (156 of 204 cases), and 70.1% (143 of 204 cases), respectively, for original and 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 compressed images. Results of logistic regression model analysis confirmed the significant effects of compression rate and nodule attenuation, size, and location on sensitivity (P <.05).
Conclusion:
While no reduction in nodule detection at 10:1 compression levels was demonstrated by using ROC analysis, a significant decrease in sensitivity was identified. Further investigation is needed before widespread use of image compression technology in low-dose chest CT can be recommended.

