Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Autocorrelation problems in short time series.

Jaume Arnau1, Roser Bono

  • 1University of Barcelona, Spain. JARNAU@PSI.UB.ES

Psychological Reports
|June 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When to use Bootstrap-F in One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA: Type I Error and Power.

Psicothema·2025
Same author

Tools and resources for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Cirugia espanola·2024
Same author

Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted <i>F</i>-tests when sphericity is violated: which procedure is best?

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power.

Psicothema·2023
Same author

Report Quality of Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Psychology: A Systematic Review.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Current Practices in Data Analysis Procedures in Psychology: What Has Changed?

Frontiers in psychology·2019
Same journal

Finding Freudenfreude: Deriving Subjective Well-Being From Passive Observation of a Relational Tie's Happiness via Social Media Post.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Flourishing and Quality of Life as Indicators of Psychological Well-Being in Adults.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Understanding Love in Couple Relationships: A Scoping Review of Sternberg's Triangular Theory.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Psychological Impacts of Instagram Use: The Interplay of Social Comparison, Self-Esteem, and Anxiety.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Self-Compassion on Shame in Post-Event Processing.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Tracking Rumination as a Stable Habit (TRASH); Scale Modification and Convergent Validity in a Clinical Sample of Youth With a History of Depression.

Psychological reports·2026
See all related articles

Autocorrelation in behavioral data may be negatively biased in small samples, challenging conventional statistical methods. Further analysis confirmed normal distribution of autocorrelation values and identified accurate methods for standard deviation calculation.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Psychological Research Methods

Background:

  • Autocorrelation in behavioral data is a critical factor in statistical analysis.
  • Previous work by Huitema (1985) suggested conventional methods are appropriate.
  • The potential impact of small sample sizes on autocorrelation has been a point of discussion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the problem of autocorrelation in behavioral data.
  • To specifically investigate autocorrelation in small sample designs.
  • To assess the accuracy of different methods for calculating standard deviation in the context of autocorrelation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 100 baseline datasets from small sample designs.
  • Data published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis in 1992.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of autocorrelation values and their distribution.

    • Main Results:

    • A negative bias was observed in autocorrelation values, particularly pronounced in very small samples.
    • Autocorrelation values were found to be normally distributed.
    • The method proposed by Davies, Trigg, and Newbold (1977) demonstrated the highest accuracy in standard deviation calculation.

    Conclusions:

    • Autocorrelation in small sample behavioral designs may exhibit a negative bias.
    • The normal distribution of autocorrelation values supports certain statistical approaches.
    • The Davies, Trigg, and Newbold (1977) method is recommended for accurate standard deviation calculation in these contexts.