Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A guide to systematic reviews.

Ian G Needleman¹

¹Department of Periodontology, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, UK. i.needleman@eastman.ucl.ac.uk

Journal of Clinical Periodontology

|June 6, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Has the quality of reporting in periodontology changed in 14 years? A systematic review.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2016

Same author

Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review.

Clinical oral investigations·2012

Same author

Randomized controlled trial of toothbrushing to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia pathogens and dental plaque in a critical care unit.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2011

Same author

Consensus Report: 2nd European Workshop on Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation for Oral Health Professionals.

International dental journal·2010

Same author

Improving the effectiveness of tobacco use cessation (TUC).

International dental journal·2010

Same author

The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2008

Same journal

Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Platforms for the Diagnosis and Management of Periodontal Diseases: A Blinded Expert-Rated Comparative Study of 11 Systems.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026

Same journal

Local Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate Attenuates Periodontal Bone Loss by Modulating Inflammatory, Immune and Osteoclastogenic Signalling.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026

Same journal

Correction to ''Clinical Efficacy of Interventions Based on Professional Mechanical Plaque Removal in the Treatment of Dental Biofilm-Induced Gingivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis''.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026

Same journal

Extracellular Vesicles From Young Brain-Mediated Delivery of PRDX3 Ameliorates Alveolar Bone Loss in Periodontitis.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026

Same journal

Cost Consequence Analysis of Non-Surgical Treatment Approaches for Patients With Periodontitis.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026

Same journal

Management of Non-Plaque-Induced Gingival Conditions: A Systematic Review-Part 2: Inflammatory and Immune Conditions; Neoplasms; and Gingival Pigmentation.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Systematic reviews offer a transparent, evidence-based approach to appraising biomedical research, differing from traditional reviews. Understanding their methodology aids clinical decision-making and minimizes bias in evidence evaluation.

Area of Science:

Biomedicine
Evidence-based practice
Research methodology

Background:

Systematic reviews are increasingly prevalent in biomedical research.
They aim for comprehensive and unbiased evidence appraisal.
Traditional narrative reviews lack the rigor of systematic approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

To guide understanding of systematic review rationale and nature.
To highlight the methodological differences from narrative reviews.
To explain the role of systematic reviews in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

Employing research methodology for review conduct.
Focusing on transparent methods to minimize bias.
Providing a contemporary appraisal of existing research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Systematic reviews provide a rigorous evaluation of evidence.
They are distinct from narrative reviews in their approach.
Their structured methodology enhances reliability.

Conclusions:

Systematic reviews are essential tools in biomedicine.
Their transparent and unbiased methods support clinical decisions.
Understanding their principles is crucial for evidence-based practice.