Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches.

Stephen Monsell1, Petroc Sumner, Helen Waters

  • 1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England. s.monsell@ex.ac.uk

Memory & Cognition
|June 11, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Cerebral Basis for Visual Discomfort and Visual Stress.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Exploring the association between mental imagery, sensory sensitivity, and autistic traits in autistic and non-autistic adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sensory sensitivity and visual discomfort are not associated with altered gamma oscillations: A test of the excitation-inhibition hypothesis.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Validating the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement for Dizziness and Imbalance (COSIDI).

International journal of audiology·2025
Same author

Sensory hyperacusis as a predictor of anxiety in adolescence.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2025
Same author

Correction: WAND: A multi-modal dataset integrating advanced MRI, MEG, and TMS for multi-scale brain analysis.

Scientific data·2025
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Task switching costs in cognitive control are reduced by predictable task changes, but not by random ones. Strategic preparation helps manage task-set interference, with control being reactive rather than proactive.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Task switching involves reconfiguring cognitive control to adapt to changing task demands.
  • Understanding the dynamics of task-set preparation and interference is crucial for optimizing performance.
  • Previous research suggests both proactive and reactive control mechanisms influence switch costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of predictable versus random task switching on cognitive control.
  • To examine the role of task-set priming and strategic modulation in managing switch costs.
  • To determine whether control of interference is proactive or reactive.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed digit classification tasks, switching between high/low and odd/even rules.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1 used predictable switching (every 2, 4, or 8 trials).
  • Experiment 2 compared predictable (4-trial) switching with random switching.

    • Main Results:

    • Predictable switching limited costs to the first trial of a run, unlike random switching.
    • Task-set priming, rather than strategic modulation, dominated performance after initial trials.
    • Preparation reduced switch costs but not interference from irrelevant attributes, indicating reactive interference control.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive control adapts to predictable task switches more efficiently than random ones.
    • Task-set priming is a powerful mechanism that can override strategic control.
    • Interference control in task switching appears to be primarily reactive.