Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability of an automatic sensing algorithm.

M Berg1, G Fröhlig, H Schwerdt

  • 1Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[High impedance electrodes].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2016
Same author

[Statement on Porzsolt in "monitor healthcare research"].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2013
Same author

[Pacemakers and ICDs].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2013
Same author

[Cardiac resynchronization therapy: preoperative screening. How can we reliably predict response to CRT?].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same author

[Not Available].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same author

[Not Available].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same journal

Dual Coronary Sinus Lead Strategy to Avoid Tricuspid Valve Traversal in Biventricular Pacing.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

A Case of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation via the Epicardial Approach Using the 3830 Lead in an 11-Day-Old Neonate (With Follow-Up of the Above Case).

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Tilt Test Duration in Suspected Vasovagal Syncope: Temporal Patterns and Diagnostic Yield in Patients From Central China.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Combined Leadless Pacing and Subcutaneous ICD Therapy in Long QT Syndromes.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Association of Anesthesia Modality With Procedural Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in PVI for Atrial Fibrillation.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
See all related articles

Automatic adaptation of atrial sensitivity in pacemakers did not show superiority over fixed settings during exercise and Holter monitoring. Pacemaker function varied, with some patients experiencing sensing issues like missed beats or oversensing.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Dual-chamber pacemakers require precise atrial sensitivity settings for optimal function.
  • Automatic adaptation aims to adjust sensitivity dynamically, but its efficacy needs evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the automatic adaptation of atrial sensitivity in dual-chamber pacemakers during exercise and Holter monitoring.
  • To compare the performance of automatic versus fixed atrial sensitivity settings.

Main Methods:

  • 18 patients with dual-chamber pacemakers underwent exercise tests with automatic atrial sensitivity adaptation.
  • 24-hour Holter ECGs were recorded to monitor sensitivity variations and pacemaker function.
  • A subset of 12 patients had Holter recordings with automatic adaptation alternately switched on and off.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mean atrial sensitivity decreased during exercise (2.30 to 2.03 mV).
  • Significant variations in sensitivity were observed, with 11 patients showing a decline.
  • Pacemaker function showed mixed results, including missed P waves, ectopic beat interference, and oversensing in some patients.

Conclusions:

  • Automatic adaptation of atrial sensitivity did not demonstrate superiority over fixed settings in this patient group.
  • Variability in sensitivity and sensing issues highlight potential challenges with automatic adaptation algorithms.