Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence intervals for the 50 per cent response dose.

D Faraggi1, P Izikson, B Reiser

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Statistics in Medicine
|June 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Hemoptysis and acute kidney injury in COVID-19].

Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin·2020
Same author

Gold nanorods with conjugated polymer ligands: sintering-free conductive inks for printed electronics.

Chemical science·2018
Same author

Multivalent bonds in self-assembled bundles of ultrathin gold nanowires.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2016
Same author

Diabetes, but not the metabolic syndrome, predicts the severity and extent of coronary artery disease in women.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2007
Same author

Heart rate variability (HRV) of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the post-insult sub-acute period.

Brain injury·2005
Same author

Microglial stability and repopulation in the retina.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2005

This study compares methods for calculating confidence intervals for the 50% response dose. Simulation results indicate that bootstrap confidence intervals offer a reliable approach for dose-response analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacometrics
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of the 50% response dose is critical in pharmaceutical and toxicological studies.
  • Existing methods for confidence intervals, including the Delta method and Fieller's procedure, have limitations.
  • Newer methods, such as likelihood ratio-based intervals, are proposed but lack extensive validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate and compare the performance of various confidence interval methods for the 50% response dose.
  • To identify the most reliable and accurate method for constructing these intervals.
  • To provide guidance on method selection in dose-response modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Extensive simulation study comparing multiple confidence interval calculation methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the Delta method, Fieller's procedure, and likelihood ratio-based intervals.
  • Inclusion and assessment of the approximate bootstrap confidence (ABC) procedure and adjusted likelihood ratio intervals.

    • Main Results:

    • The simulation study provides empirical evidence on the coverage and width of different confidence intervals.
    • Performance metrics were analyzed across various scenarios to assess method robustness.
    • Specific methods demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy and precision.

    Conclusions:

    • The approximate bootstrap confidence (ABC) procedure emerged as a highly recommended method for calculating confidence intervals for the 50% response dose.
    • Adjusted likelihood ratio-based intervals also showed promise, offering competitive performance.
    • The findings suggest a shift towards more robust methods in dose-response analysis.