Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability.

Catherine M Jones1, Victoria A Braithwaite, Susan D Healy

  • 1Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Behavioral Neuroscience
|June 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Silicosis in the Artificial Stone Countertop Industry: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Nest building as a missing piece in biparental care.

Biology letters·2026
Same author

The role of personal reproductive experience on nest building in a wild bird.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026
Same author

Rationale for the Nodule Management Protocol of the Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Dynamic strategic social learning in nest-building zebra finches and its generalizability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

The Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program: A Radiologist's Perspective.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2025
Same journal

Characterization of behaviors during food consumption under novelty and threat learning in male and female rats.

Behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hippocampal communication with the anterior olfactory nucleus is necessary for context-dependent odor memory.

Behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Biological sex and normative cognitive aging across spatial learning, flexibility, and working memory in Fischer 344 rats.

Behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Defensive antinociception and antipredatory responses in prey threatened by distinct odoriferous cues from Felis silvestris catus.

Behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Taste exposure during different developmental phases impacts aversion learning in adult rats.

Behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Structural neuroanatomy of semantic retrograde memory in older adults.

Behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Evolutionary hypotheses for male mammals having better spatial ability than females lack substantial support. The range size hypothesis shows the most promise, but requires further testing in various species.

Area of Science:

  • Comparative psychology
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Sex differences in spatial cognition are widely observed in mammals.
  • Numerous evolutionary hypotheses attempt to explain these differences, often focusing on male advantages.
  • Empirical testing of these hypotheses across diverse species remains limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review existing evolutionary hypotheses for sex differences in mammalian spatial cognition.
  • To evaluate the empirical support for each proposed hypothesis.
  • To identify promising hypotheses and suggest future research directions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis of evolutionary hypotheses.
  • Assessment of existing empirical data supporting or refuting hypotheses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of testable predictions for future research.

    • Main Results:

    • Most proposed evolutionary hypotheses for sex differences in spatial cognition are logically flawed or lack sufficient empirical support.
    • Existing data do not exclusively support or exclude any single hypothesis.
    • The hypothesis linking spatial ability to territory or range size demonstrates the strongest, albeit limited, support.

    Conclusions:

    • Current evolutionary explanations for sex differences in spatial cognition are largely unsubstantiated.
    • Further rigorous testing is needed to validate or refute existing hypotheses.
    • Future research should focus on specific predictions and employ diverse species to advance understanding of spatial cognition evolution.