Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

Method to Obtain Pattern of Breathing in Senescent Mice through Unrestrained Barometric Plethysmography
Published on: April 28, 2020
Counting respiratory rate in infants under 2 months: comparison between observation and auscultation
Sunit Singhi1, A K Bhalla, Ashok Bhandari
1Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. drsinghi@glide.net.in
Insights
Observing chest movements is as reliable as listening for respiratory rate (RR) in infants. This finding supports the World Health Organization
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Respiratory Medicine
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) utilizes respiratory rate (RR) counting via observation for diagnosing pneumonia in acute respiratory infections.
- Reliability studies comparing observational RR counting with other methods are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of the observational method for counting respiratory rate (RR) in healthy infants.
- To compare RR measurements obtained by observation versus auscultation.
Main Methods:
- Simultaneous RR counting by observation and auscultation in 100 healthy infants.
- Measurements were taken at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of age.
- RR was counted for durations of 15, 30, and 60 seconds.
Main Results:
- Coefficients of variation for RR were similar between observational and auscultatory methods across all age groups.
- Mean RR by observation was slightly higher (1-3 breaths/min) than by auscultation (p < 0.001).
- The 95% confidence interval for the difference between methods ranged from +5 to -8 breaths/min when counted for 60 seconds.
Conclusions:
- Observational counting of respiratory rate is as reliable as auscultation in healthy infants.
- This supports the continued use of the observational method in global acute respiratory infection control programs.
Abstract:
The World Health Organization's global programme for the control of acute respiratory infections relies on counting respiratory rate (RR) by observing abdominal and chest movements in order to diagnose pneumonia. However, few studies on the reliability of the observation method have been published. We counted RR simultaneously by observation and auscultation in 100 healthy infants at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of age for 15, 30 and 60 sec, and compared RRs obtained by the two methods. In all the age groups studied, the co-efficients of variation for the RRs recorded by observation or auscultation were similar. The mean RR by observation was higher by 1-3 breaths/min than mean RR by auscultation (p < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval (+/-2 SD) for the difference between RR by the two methods ranged from +5 to -8 breaths/min for RR counted for 1 full minute. Our data support the assumption that observation is as reliable as auscultation for counting RR.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is important.
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration can...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract IV: Auscultation
Breath Sounds
Breath sounds are categorized into vesicular, bronchovesicular, and bronchial.
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation
Palpation Findings
During a respiratory assessment, palpation can reveal several vital abnormalities:

