Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

10:02
Characterization of the Isolated, Ventilated, and Instrumented Mouse Lung Perfused with Pulsatile Flow
Published on: April 29, 2011
Applications of the pulsatile flow versatile ECLS: in vivo studies
1Interdisciplinary Program in Biomedical Engineering Major, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
The International Journal of Artificial Organs
|June 28, 2003
Summary
The Twin-Pulse Life Support (T-PLS) device offers a safer alternative for Extra Corporeal Life Support (ECLS) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Its dual sac system reduces pressure and hemolysis, protecting patients, including those with ARDS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Engineering
- Biomedical Devices
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Twin-Pulse Life Support (T-PLS) is the first commercial pulsatile Extra Corporeal Life Support (ECLS) device.
- Its dual sac structure minimizes membrane oxygenator inlet pressure and hemolysis.
- Various models were tested to validate T-PLS for ECLS and its advantages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the T-PLS device in different clinical scenarios.
- To compare T-PLS performance against conventional devices like Biopump.
- To assess T-PLS's potential as an alternative to standard cardiopulmonary bypass and resuscitation methods.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis in partial cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) models (swine) using T-PLS, Biopump, and a single pulsatile pump.
- Evaluation in a total CPB model (bovine) with induced cardiac arrest.
- Assessment in emergency cardiac arrest (canine) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) models (canine).
Main Results:
- T-PLS demonstrated significantly lower inlet pressure (max ~250 mmHg) and comparable hemolysis levels to centrifugal pumps, unlike single pulsatile pumps (700-800 mmHg).
- In total CPB, T-PLS maintained physiological pulsatile flow (26-43 mmHg pulse pressure, 40-60 bpm).
- Successful resuscitation was achieved in emergency cardiac arrest models, and adequate oxygenation (PO2 258 mmHg) was maintained in ARDS models.
Conclusions:
- T-PLS shows promise as a portable pulsatile ECLS device for CPB and as an alternative CPR device.
- Its pulsatile flow effectively delivers oxygenated blood without overloading the heart, particularly beneficial for ARDS patients.
- The T-PLS device offers a potentially safer and more effective solution for critical circulatory support.

