Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

06:36
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
Published on: April 15, 2020
Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis.
Thor F Besier1, Daina L Sturnieks, Jacque A Alderson
1School of Human Movement and Exercise Science, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6907, Australia.
Journal of Biomechanics
|July 2, 2003
Summary
This study compared two gait analysis models. The functional (FUN) model, which avoids anatomical landmarks, showed slightly better repeatability for hip and knee motion and forces compared to the anatomical landmark (AL) model.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human movement analysis
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Repeatability of kinematic and kinetic models is crucial for accurate gait analysis.
- Traditional models rely on precise anatomical landmark (AL) identification, which can be challenging and affect data consistency.
- Novel numerical methods independent of ALs may enhance the reliability of gait data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the repeatability of gait data between an anatomical landmark (AL) based model and a functional (FUN) model.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a foot calibration rig in defining the foot segment independently of ALs.
- To assess the influence of tester and session variations on model repeatability.
Main Methods:
- Developed and compared an AL model and a FUN model for gait analysis.
- The FUN model utilized a functional method for hip joint centers and a mean helical axis for knee joint axes.
- A foot calibration rig was used to define the foot segment in both models, independent of ALs.
Main Results:
- The FUN model demonstrated slightly superior repeatability for hip and knee kinematic and kinetic data compared to the AL model.
- Repeatability was consistent across within-tester and between-tester sessions for both models.
- The foot calibration rig provided a repeatable method for foot segment definition without requiring precise AL identification.
Conclusions:
- The FUN model offers improved repeatability in gait analysis and eliminates the need for accurate AL localization.
- The functional method and foot calibration rig are advantageous, particularly for populations where AL identification is difficult.
- Both models showed similar repeatability across different testing sessions, indicating robust methodologies.

