Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research misconduct.

F J Gilbert1, A R Denison

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. f.j.gilbert@abdn.ac.uk

Clinical Radiology
|July 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding research misconduct is crucial for scientific integrity. This study assessed misconduct in radiology, finding infrequent duplicate publications across major journals and discussing strategies for improvement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deploying AI in radiology.

Clinical radiology·2025
Same author

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Oestrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancers: The Neo-RT Feasibility Study.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2024
Same author

Introduction of automated breast ultrasound as an additional screening tool for dense breasts in the UK: a practical approach from the BRAID trial.

Clinical radiology·2024
Same author

Corrigendum to "Overview of trials on artificial intelligence algorithms in breast cancer screening - A roadmap for international evaluation and implementation" [Eur. J. Radiol. 167 (2023) 111087].

European journal of radiology·2023
Same author

Overview of trials on artificial intelligence algorithms in breast cancer screening - A roadmap for international evaluation and implementation.

European journal of radiology·2023
Same author

An optoacoustic imaging feature set to characterise blood vessels surrounding benign and malignant breast lesions.

Photoacoustics·2022
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of flat panel computed tomography for acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear medicine techniques in gynaecological malignancy: a review of best practice.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning reconstruction dual-energy computed tomography for gastrointestinal system tumors: low-kiloelectron volt imaging vs routine imaging.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based reconstruction for 5.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of image quality and diagnostic efficacy.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Papillary muscle fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review of causes, diagnostic challenges and practical pearls.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based automated assessment of pulmonary artery indices and surgical approach triage for tetralogy of Fallot from multicenter cardiac computed tomography (CT).

Clinical radiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Ethics
  • Scientific Publication

Background:

  • Maintaining high standards in research practice is essential for the scientific community.
  • Awareness of and adherence to ethical guidelines prevent research misconduct.
  • Various forms of research misconduct can undermine scientific validity and trust.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define various types of research misconduct.
  • To assess the prevalence of research misconduct, specifically redundant or duplicate publication, within the field of radiology.
  • To discuss potential strategies for addressing research misconduct in radiology.

Main Methods:

  • Defined different types of research misconduct.
  • Surveyed five prominent English-language radiology journals to gauge the frequency of reported misconduct.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reviewed guidance from established research ethics bodies.

    • Main Results:

    • Redundant or duplicate publication was reported infrequently across the surveyed radiology journals.
    • Specific counts of reported cases were noted for Radiology (1), American Journal of Roentgenology (3), Clinical Radiology (3), British Journal of Radiology (2), and European Radiology (1).

    Conclusions:

    • While infrequent, research misconduct like duplicate publication occurs in radiology.
    • The radiology community can benefit from established guidance on tackling research misconduct.
    • Adherence to ethical standards and proactive measures are necessary to uphold scientific integrity.