Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Section V: techniques of esophageal resection.

Philip A Linden1, David J Sugarbaker

  • 1Harvard Medical School, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|July 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has high risks, but specialized techniques can significantly reduce mortality. A tri-incisional approach offers improved outcomes by combining cervical anastomosis and transthoracic dissection for safer esophageal cancer treatment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cut, Clip, Burn: A Combined Approach to Lung Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports·2026
Same author

REPLY: Failure to rescue after esophagectomy.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Oncologic Outcomes following Resection for Primary Chest Wall Tumors: Review of Multi-institutional Database Studies.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026
Same author

Evaluating failure to rescue after esophagectomy: The esophagectomy failure to rescue assessment, trends, and Evaluation (E-FATE) study.

JTCVS open·2025
Same author

Response Regarding: Gender Disparities in Career Longevity Among Surgeons and Physicians: A Decade-long Analysis.

The Journal of surgical research·2025
Same author

Comparative Analysis of Overall Survival in Mucinous and Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Insights From a National Cancer Database Study.

The Journal of surgical research·2025

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Esophagectomy is the primary treatment for esophageal cancer.
  • Nationwide, it has a 10% mortality and 50% morbidity rate, with a 5-year survival of 20%.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss various esophagectomy methods.
  • To detail the tri-incisional esophagectomy technique.
  • To highlight the benefits of combining cervical anastomosis and transthoracic dissection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established esophagectomy techniques (Ivor-Lewis, transhiatal, etc.).
  • Detailed description of the tri-incisional esophagectomy procedure.
  • Emphasis on surgical planning, technique, and patient care.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Large academic centers report reduced mortality rates to 3% with meticulous surgical care.
  • The tri-incisional technique integrates advantages of Ivor-Lewis and transhiatal approaches.
  • Cervical anastomosis avoids intrathoracic leaks and minimizes reflux.

Conclusions:

  • The tri-incisional esophagectomy technique offers a safer and more effective approach to esophageal cancer treatment.
  • This method facilitates complete esophagectomy, safe dissection, and comprehensive lymphadenectomy.
  • Improved surgical strategies can significantly enhance patient survival and reduce complications.