Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defining projective techniques: finding common ground for discourse.

Edwin E Wagner

    Psychological Reports
    |July 5, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Beyond "objective" and "projective": a logical system for classifying psychological tests: comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006).

    Journal of personality assessment·2008
    Same author

    Using broad measures of maladjustment to assess psychological states of outpatients with schizophrenia.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2003
    Same author

    Differences on the projective hand test among chronic pain patients reporting three different pain experiences.

    Journal of personality assessment·2002
    Same journal

    Understanding Love in Couple Relationships: A Scoping Review of Sternberg's Triangular Theory.

    Psychological reports·2026
    Same journal

    Psychological Impacts of Instagram Use: The Interplay of Social Comparison, Self-Esteem, and Anxiety.

    Psychological reports·2026
    Same journal

    The Effect of Self-Compassion on Shame in Post-Event Processing.

    Psychological reports·2026
    Same journal

    Tracking Rumination as a Stable Habit (TRASH); Scale Modification and Convergent Validity in a Clinical Sample of Youth With a History of Depression.

    Psychological reports·2026
    Same journal

    Prompting to Practice: Daily Practice Mediates the Benefits of Supplement to a Mindfulness-Based Intervention.

    Psychological reports·2026
    Same journal

    Continued Influence Effect: A Three-Dimensional Framework Shaping Practical and Theoretical Perspectives.

    Psychological reports·2026
    See all related articles

    A precise definition of projective tests reveals two response types, falsifications and misrepresentations, consistently linked to psychopathology. This offers a core set of valid predictors across various projective techniques.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Psychopathology Research
    • Psychological Assessment

    Background:

    • Traditional definitions of projective tests by Lilienfeld, Wood, and Garb (2000) were noted as imprecise.
    • The need for a more rigorous and exclusive definition of projective tests was identified.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To derive response classes indicative of deviancy from a precise definition of projective tests.
    • To explore the relationship between psychopathology and specific response types within projective testing.

    Main Methods:

    • A focused literature review was conducted.
    • Analysis of response types, specifically falsifications and misrepresentations, in relation to psychopathology.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Two classes of responses, falsifications and misrepresentations, were logically derived from a precise definition.
  • Consistent relations were found between psychopathology and these two response types in the literature.

    • Conclusions:

    • Falsifications and misrepresentations represent a circumscribed core of valid predictors across projective techniques.
    • A refined definition of projective tests can yield reliable indicators of psychological deviancy.