Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Category use and category learning.

Arthur B Markman1, Brian H Ross

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 78712, USA. markman@psy.utexas.edu

Psychological Bulletin
|July 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.

Memory & cognition·2019
Same author

Anchoring on Self and Others During Social Inferences.

Topics in cognitive science·2017
Same author

Introduction: 2016 Rumelhart Prize Issue Honoring Dedre Gentner.

Topics in cognitive science·2017
Same author

Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori.

Thinking & reasoning·2016
Same author

The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.

Cognitive processing·2016
Same author

Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Sport, exercise, and performance psychology·2016
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Is thinking inherently unpleasant? A cautionary note on David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024).

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Laboratory studies on categorization often overlook diverse category uses, impacting how we understand natural categories. Exploring varied uses, like predictive inference, enhances category learning models beyond simple classification.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Laboratory categorization models often use a limited set of explanatory constructs.
  • This limitation stems from a primary reliance on classification tasks in experimental settings.
  • Natural category structures may require broader explanatory frameworks than laboratory studies typically provide.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact of diverse category uses on category learning.
  • To contrast classification with other tasks, such as predictive inference.
  • To examine how problem-solving and communication influence category representations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research on category learning.
  • Analysis of tasks formally equivalent to classification but yielding different learning patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of studies involving problem-solving, communication, and combined inference-classification.

    • Main Results:

    • Classification-based laboratory studies may not fully capture the complexity of natural category learning.
    • Predictive inference tasks, despite formal equivalence to classification, lead to distinct learning patterns.
    • Category representations are shaped by interaction with category members and varied task demands.

    Conclusions:

    • Laboratory research on categorization should incorporate a wider range of category uses to better explain natural categories.
    • Moving beyond simple classification is crucial for developing more comprehensive category learning models.
    • Understanding how different tasks influence learning is key to advancing the study of categorization.