Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
Error budget calculations in laboratory medicine: linking the concepts of biological variation and allowable medical
A K Stroobants1, H M J Goldschmidt, M Plebani
1Department of General Clinical Chemistry Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Random, systematic and sporadic errors, which unfortunately are not uncommon in laboratory medicine, can have a considerable impact on the well being of patients. Although somewhat difficult to attain, our main goal should be to prevent all possible errors. A good insight on error-prone steps in the laboratory process is essential to achieving a structured system for error reduction.
Methods:
Here, the process of laboratory medicine is divided into phases, and for each phase, an error frequency is presented. While error frequencies in the laboratory (pre-analytical to post-analytical) have been reported elsewhere, we also include them in the present paper. In order to investigate error frequencies in the pre-pre- and post-post-analytical phases, clinicians were asked to carefully answer questions concerning their ordering strategies for laboratory investigation and their interpretation of results.
Results:
In the present study, the overall error rate in laboratory medicine was found to be 20.0%. The error percentages in the pre-pre- and post-post-analytical phase were about 12.0% and 5.0%, respectively. This indicates that, also on the clinical side, error reduction is desirable, especially in the requesting of laboratory investigation. Error reduction can be achieved through process redesigning by, for example, applying the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points approach. The error budget that clinicians might spend, based upon critical differences, is 26.9%. For the same test set and production circumstances, the overall biological variation is 7.9%. Clinicians thus take the error rates into account in their practical, daily use, and the ultimate achievable in laboratory medicine is biological variation.
Conclusions:
Several currently available software applications can aid error reduction in clinical chemistry. Both laboratory consultants and the use of information and communication technology are essential tools in optimizing the efficiency of laboratory medicine.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

