Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Transitional determinacies.

P A Luelsdorff1

  • 1Universität Regensburg, BRD.

Folia Phoniatrica
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces transitional determinacies to explain the difference between linguistic production and recognition. These determinacies also clarify recognition differences in prosopagnosia patients, impacting theories of grammar.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Priority as frequency.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·1994
Same author

Determinacy experience.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·1994
Same author

On putative 'transpositions' in spelling.

Folia phoniatrica·1985
Same author

On language and schizophrenia.

Folia phoniatrica·1982
Same author

Differential linguistics: a program for research.

Folia phoniatrica·1982

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Classic generative grammar distinguishes competence (knowledge) from performance (use).
  • This distinction overlooks the difference between production and recognition knowledge.
  • Prosopagnosia patients exhibit overt and covert recognition differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that linguistic production and recognition are distinct processes.
  • To introduce 'transitional determinacies' as a mechanism explaining this difference.
  • To apply transitional determinacies to understand recognition deficits in prosopagnosia.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of linguistic knowledge for production versus recognition.
  • Development of 'transitional determinacies' to model the derivation between production and recognition.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of transitional determinacies in prosopagnosic and normal individuals.

    • Main Results:

    • Linguistic recognition is not the inverse of production; both require transitional determinacies.
    • Transitional determinacies explain overt versus covert recognition.
    • Prosopagnosics require more 'binders' (precisors) for covert recognition than controls.

    Conclusions:

    • Transitional determinacies are essential for understanding the relationship between linguistic production and recognition.
    • These determinacies offer a novel explanation for recognition differences in prosopagnosia.
    • Transitional determinacies are as fundamental to grammar theory as existing determinacies.