Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determinacy experience

P A Luelsdorff1

  • 1Universität Regensburg, Deutschland.

Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica : Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Priority as frequency.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·1994
Same author

Transitional determinacies.

Folia phoniatrica·1992
Same author

On putative 'transpositions' in spelling.

Folia phoniatrica·1985
Same author

On language and schizophrenia.

Folia phoniatrica·1982
Same author

Differential linguistics: a program for research.

Folia phoniatrica·1982

This study introduces determinacy grammar (DG) to analyze determinacy experience (DE), distinguishing between the determinacy of experience [D(E)] and the experience of determinacy [E(D)]. The framework emphasizes frequentative relations and a priori knowledge of determinacy form (DF).

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Linguistics
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Existing frameworks lack a robust model for understanding determinacy experience.
  • The need for a theoretical structure to analyze the nuances of determinacy is evident.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and detail the theoretical framework of determinacy grammar (DG).
  • To bifurcate determinacy experience (DE) into the determinacy of experience [D(E)] and the experience of determinacy [E(D)].
  • To explore the role of frequentative relations and a priori knowledge in determinacy.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the determinacy data matrix (DM) and determinacy analysis (DA).
  • Introduction of determinacy accuracy (I) and determinacy completeness (C) metrics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on frequentative, rather than temporal or spatial, relations.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed framework (DG) offers a novel approach to understanding determinacy experience.
    • Identification of key components: determinacy data matrix (DM), determinacy analysis (DA), determinacy accuracy (I), and determinacy completeness (C).
    • Distinction between D(E) and E(D) provides a new lens for analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Determinacy grammar (DG) provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for determinacy experience (DE).
    • The model highlights the significance of frequentative relations and a priori determinacy form (DF).
    • Further research is suggested into knowledge acquisition, attrition, and variation within this framework.