Related Experiment Videos
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis
Céline Bourguignon1, Anne-Sabine Destrumelle, Stéphane Koch
1Central Supply of Medical Devices, Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon Cx, France.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|July 23, 2003
Summary
Reusable biopsy forceps are more cost-effective than disposable ones, despite potential infection risks. Further research is needed to fully characterize transmission risks for both types of biopsy forceps.
Area of Science:
- Medical Devices
- Healthcare Economics
- Infection Control
Background:
- Disposable biopsy forceps are perceived as safer than reusable ones due to reduced infection transmission risk.
- Existing cost analyses comparing reusable and disposable biopsy forceps yield conflicting results.
- This study directly compares the economic costs associated with reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-minimization analysis comparing reusable and disposable biopsy forceps from a hospital's perspective.
- To evaluate direct costs, including acquisition, cleaning, sterilization, and disposal.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cost-minimization analysis.
- Inclusion of direct costs for both reusable and disposable biopsy forceps.
- Cost components for reusable forceps: purchase, cleaning (chemicals, equipment, labor), and centralized sterilization.
- Cost components for disposable forceps: acquisition and destruction.
Main Results:
- Reusable biopsy forceps were used approximately 90 times each.
- The cost per use for reusable biopsy forceps was $6.84 ($3.59 acquisition, $2.28 cleaning, $0.97 sterilization).
- The cost per use for disposable biopsy forceps ranged from $10.72 to $15.63, with additional costs from $3.88 to $8.79.
Conclusions:
- Reusable biopsy forceps present a more economical option based on direct cost analysis.
- The potential risk of infectious disease transmission associated with both types of forceps remains uncharacterized and requires consideration.
- A comprehensive evaluation should balance economic factors with the unquantified risks of infection transmission.