Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Monophasic and biphasic stimulation evoke different responses.

Edelle C Field-Fote1, Brent Anderson, Valma J Robertson

  • 1Division of Physical Therapy, University of Miami School of Medicine, 5915 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Ste 500, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, USA. edee@miami.edu

Muscle & Nerve
|July 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were studied using different electrical pulse types. Findings suggest biphasic pulses stimulate nerves more effectively at low intensities than previously thought.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Association Between Psychoactive Substances Usage and Unintentional Injuries After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Bridging the Gaps for Functional Restoration After Spinal Cord Injury: Emerging Directions in Clinically Accessible Neuromodulation, Neurorehabilitation, and Biomarkers.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

Biologics and Novel Therapeutics in Food Allergy.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2026
Same author

Perceived Value, Ownership, and Barriers to Smart Home Technology for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Disease.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Immediate Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation on Stretch-Induced Spasticity in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Trends in allergen-reactive CRTH2+ T cells and TARC associated with successful outcomes in a phase 2 cashew oral immunotherapy study.

Frontiers in immunology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Understanding nerve stimulation is crucial for diagnostics and therapeutics.
  • Electrical stimulation parameters, like pulse type, influence nerve response.
  • Previous research has not fully elucidated the effect of biphasic pulse characteristics on sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare sensory perception thresholds and SNAP waveforms elicited by monophasic and biphasic electrical stimuli.
  • To investigate the impact of pulse duration and waveform on nerve excitability.

Main Methods:

  • 31 subjects underwent psychophysiological testing and electrophysiological recording.
  • Constant-current, 100-microsecond monophasic negative pulses were compared with biphasic symmetrical pulses (100 microseconds per phase).

Related Experiment Videos

  • 200-microsecond monophasic negative pulses were also evaluated, with stimuli delivered to the index finger and SNAPs recorded from the median nerve.

    • Main Results:

    • Perception thresholds differed significantly across the three stimulation conditions.
    • At low intensities, biphasic stimuli produced SNAPs with two negative phases, while monophasic stimuli yielded a single negative phase.
    • At higher intensities, all stimuli resulted in a single large negative phase SNAP, irrespective of waveform.

    Conclusions:

    • The trailing positive phase of a biphasic pulse exerts a stimulating effect at low intensities.
    • This challenges historical assumptions regarding the efficacy of biphasic nerve stimulation.
    • Results have implications for optimizing electrodiagnostic and therapeutic nerve stimulation techniques.