Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Explicit and implicit processes in multicue judgment.

Jonathan St B T Evans1, John Clibbens, Allegra Cattani

  • 1Centre for Thinking and Language, Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England. jevans@plym.ac.uk

Memory & Cognition
|July 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gloves Are Hands: How English and Italian Children Label Nouns and Predicates at 24 and 30 Months in a Picture-Naming Task.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

EngageEMR: Codesigning resources to promote patient and carer engagement with their hospital electronic medical record.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same author

Selective Visual Attention in ADHD: A Narrative Review.

Current neurology and neuroscience reports·2025
Same author

Maternal and Paternal Education on Italian Monolingual Toddlers' Language Skills.

Brain sciences·2024
Same author

Mothers experiences of the Parenting Under Pressure Program (PuP) in a Residential Therapeutic Community: A qualitative study.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2020
Same author

Are Future Psychologists Willing to Accept and Use a Humanoid Robot in Their Practice? Italian and English Students' Perspective.

Frontiers in psychology·2019
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

People have limited self-insight into their judgment processes, even when learning from experience. Both implicit and explicit cognitive processes influence decisions, impacting performance on complex tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Real-world learning often involves noisy feedback, complicating the acquisition of accurate judgmental strategies.
  • Understanding the interplay between implicit and explicit learning is crucial for explaining human judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how implicit and explicit cognitive processes influence judgment formation under varying learning conditions.
  • To examine the impact of task complexity and feedback noise on judgmental strategy acquisition and performance.
  • To explore the reasons behind moderate self-insight in expert judgment studies.

Main Methods:

  • Multicue probability learning tasks with added outcome noise to simulate experience-based learning.
  • Individual multiple linear regression analyses during a no-feedback test phase to measure acquired judgmental strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of learned strategies with self-reported cue relevance ratings.
  • Explicit instruction on cue relevance in a separate experimental condition.

    • Main Results:

    • Both implicit learning from experience and explicit instruction influenced participants' judgments.
    • Cognitive processes were sensitive to different manipulations during the learning phase.
    • On complex tasks, explicit processes persisted despite weak explicit learning, leading to performance decrements.
    • Findings suggest partial access to judgment-determining processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Human judgment is shaped by both implicit and explicit cognitive mechanisms.
    • Experience-based learning and explicit instruction interact, affecting decision-making accuracy.
    • Limited self-insight in expert judgment stems from incomplete access to the underlying cognitive processes.