Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in the setting of left bundle branch block: prevalence and observer
Lorne J Gula1, Alexander Dick, David Massel
1Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Insights
The Sgarbossa criteria show poor reliability and low sensitivity for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). These criteria are inadequate for this high-risk population, despite potential use over current practices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrocardiography
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Thrombolysis benefits acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients but is under-utilized, especially with left bundle branch block (LBBB).
- Accurate diagnosis of AMI in LBBB patients is crucial for timely treatment.
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation challenges exist with LBBB, necessitating reliable diagnostic criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the test characteristics of Sgarbossa criteria for diagnosing AMI in patients with LBBB.
- To assess the observer reliability of these diagnostic criteria.
- To evaluate the clinical utility of Sgarbossa criteria in a high-risk patient subset.
Main Methods:
- Interpreted 414 ECGs from AMI patients with LBBB and 85 ECGs from non-acute coronary syndrome LBBB patients.
- Assessed the presence of Sgarbossa criteria, including ST depression and concordant/discordant ST-segment elevation.
- Analyzed agreement and kappa values for observer reliability across different criteria.
Main Results:
- Observer agreement for Sgarbossa criteria ranged from fair to moderate.
- ST depression showed better agreement than ST-segment elevation (P<0.001).
- Concordant ST elevation (6.3%) and depression (3.1%) were infrequent in AMI; discordant ST elevation was more common (19.0%).
- Concordant ST elevation/depression in V1-V3 were specific but insensitive; discordant ST elevation lacked sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions:
- Sgarbossa criteria exhibit low prevalence, poor sensitivity, and significant observer variability for AMI diagnosis in LBBB.
- The criteria are considered inadequate for this high-risk group.
- While an improvement over current practice, Sgarbossa criteria alone are insufficient for optimal diagnosis in AMI with LBBB.
Background:
Despite the known benefit of thrombolysis it remains under-utilized among eligible patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). We sought to determine the test characteristics and observer reliability of well-known criteria for the diagnosis of AMI when LBBB is present on the electrocardiogram (ECG).
Methods:
Four hundred and fourteen ECGs with LBBB from a large cohort of AMI patients (7.4% of the total) and 85 ECGs with LBBB not in the setting of acute coronary syndromes were interpreted for the presence of the Sgarbossa criteria.
Results:
Agreement for the various Sgarbossa criteria ranged from only fair to moderate. The three-way comparison kappa values were significantly better for ST depression than for both discordant (P<0.001) and concordant (P=0.001) ST-segment elevation. Concordant ST-segment elevation [6.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-9.1%] and depression (3.1%, 95% CI 1.8-5.4%) were infrequently seen in the setting of AMI and rarely seen otherwise. Discordant ST-segment elevation was seen more frequently (19.0%, 95% CI 15.5-23.1%). Concordant ST elevation and ST depression in V1-V3 were highly specific, but insensitive, for the diagnosis of AMI. The presence of discordant ST elevation was neither sensitive nor specific.
Conclusion:
The low prevalence, poor sensitivity and marked observer variability make the Sgarbossa criteria for AMI in the setting of LBBB less than adequate. Although use of these criteria would be an advance over contemporary practice, it would still fall short among this high-risk subset.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias


