Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
Feasibility of Valve in Valve After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With SAPIEN 3 Valves and Surgical Aortic
Tej Sheth1, Warkaa Al-Shamkani1, Ahmed Makhdoum1
1Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with SAPIEN 3 at ≤90% implant depth offers the most repeatable intervention for future TAVR. Surgical aortic valve replacement with aortic root enlargement does not improve future TAVR feasibility.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Lifetime management of aortic stenosis requires assessing transcatheter intervention feasibility post-aortic valve replacement.
- Both transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are primary treatments for aortic stenosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of future transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) after initial TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) procedures.
- To compare the impact of different implant depths for SAPIEN 3 TAVR and the role of aortic root enlargement (ARE) in SAVR on future TAVR access.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study analyzed post-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans from 245 patients.
- Patients were grouped by initial intervention: TAVR (SAPIEN 3, ≤90% depth), TAVR (>90% depth), SAVR, and SAVR with ARE.
- Future TAVR feasibility was assessed by simulating neo-skirt position relative to coronary ostia and sinotubular junction on CT.
Main Results:
- The proportion of patients with the simulated neo-skirt below both coronary arteries was highest in TAVR at ≤90% implant depth (47.0%).
- Challenging anatomy for future TAVR was identified in 9.8% of TAVR (≤90% depth), 28.8% of TAVR (>90% depth), 22.6% of SAVR, and 29.0% of SAVR with ARE.
- Surgical aortic valve replacement with aortic root enlargement showed 0% favorable anatomy for future TAVR.
Conclusions:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with SAPIEN 3 at an implant depth of ≤90% provides the most favorable anatomy for subsequent TAVR.
- Surgical aortic valve replacement with aortic root enlargement does not enhance the feasibility of future transcatheter interventions.
Background:
The feasibility of transcatheter intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is important for the lifetime management of aortic stenosis.
Methods:
A multicenter study was conducted of 4 patient groups: (1) TAVR using SAPIEN 3 at ≤90% implant depth, (2) TAVR using SAPIEN 3 at >90% implant depth, (3) SAVR, and (4) SAVR with aortic root enlargement (ARE) who underwent post-treatment computed tomography. Future TAVR was classified as challenging if the simulated neo-skirt was at or above the coronary ostia and <4 mm away from the coronary ostia and/or <2 mm from the sinotubular junction or aortic wall.
Results:
A total of 245 patients were evaluated (n = 117 TAVR using SAPIEN 3 at ≤90% implant depth, n = 66 TAVR using SAPIEN 3 at >90% implant depth, n = 31 SAVR, n = 31 SAVR with ARE). The proportion of patients where the simulated neo-skirt was below both coronary arteries was the highest in TAVR with implantation depth ≤90% (47.0%), intermediate in TAVR using SAPIEN 3 at >90% implant depth (22.7%) and SAVR (12.9%), and the lowest in SAVR with ARE (0%), (p < 0.001). Challenging anatomy for future TAVR was identified in 9.8% of TAVR at ≤90% implant depth, 28.8% of TAVR at >90% implant depth, 22.6% of SAVR, and 29.0% of SAVR with ARE (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Based on post-treatment computed tomography analysis, TAVR with SAPIEN 3 at implant depth ≤90% was the most repeatable initial intervention whereas SAVR with ARE did not improve the feasibility of future TAVR.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

