Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes.

Linda A Parker1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. lparker@wlu.ca

Learning & Behavior
|July 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orally consumed cannabinoids: the effect of carrier oil on acute tissue distribution in male C57BL/6 mice.

Journal of cannabis research·2025
Same author

The Role of Cannabinoids and the Endocannabinoid System in the Treatment and Regulation of Nausea and Vomiting.

Current topics in behavioral neurosciences·2024
Same author

Evaluation of Sex Differences in the Potential of Δ<sup>9</sup>-Tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabidiol, Cannabidiolic Acid, and Oleoyl Alanine to Reduce Nausea-Induced Conditioned Gaping Reactions in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Cannabis and cannabinoid research·2022
Same author

Short communication: Tissue distribution of major cannabinoids following intraperitoneal injection in male rats.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Cannabinoids and Cancer Chemotherapy-Associated Adverse Effects.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2021
Same author

Effect of oleoyl glycine and oleoyl alanine on lithium chloride induced nausea in rats and vomiting in shrews.

Psychopharmacology·2021
Same journal

Correction: Quantifying nonmnemonic strategies in two-alternative forced-choice delayed matching and nonmatching-to-position tasks in mice (Mus musculus) using automated video tracking technologies.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Unconditional stimulus deflation is stimulus specific.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

What is possible and what is worth: Higher levers afford more work and enhance the value of leisure.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Behavioral impact of adolescent social isolation stress: A multidimensional assessment in male NMRI mice.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Behavioral characteristics of rapid visual categorization learning in domestic chicks.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Operant conditioning through positive reinforcement in the ghost crab (Ocypode quadrata).

Learning & behavior·2026
See all related articles

Conditioned taste avoidance and conditioned taste aversion are distinct processes. Avoidance involves reduced consumption, while aversion shows rejection reactions, suggesting different underlying mechanisms like fear versus nausea.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Conditioned taste avoidance and conditioned taste aversion are frequently conflated in research.
  • Evidence suggests these terms may represent distinct learning and memory processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between conditioned taste avoidance and conditioned taste aversion.
  • To elucidate the distinct measurement methods and underlying mechanisms of each phenomenon.

Main Methods:

  • Conditioned taste avoidance assessed via consumption tests (appetitive and consummatory phases).
  • Conditioned taste aversion assessed using taste reactivity tests (consummatory phase only).
  • Examined the effects of nausea-inducing and nausea-alleviating treatments on both measures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Taste avoidance is measured by consumption levels, while taste aversion is indicated by rejection reactions (e.g., gapes).
  • Nausea induction is essential for taste aversion but not taste avoidance.
  • Treatments affecting nausea impact taste aversion but not taste avoidance.

Conclusions:

  • Conditioned taste avoidance and conditioned taste aversion are independent processes.
  • Taste avoidance may be driven by conditioned fear, whereas taste aversion is linked to conditioned nausea.