Relation of aggressiveness of lipid-lowering treatment to changes in calcified plaque burden by electron beam
Harvey S Hecht1, S Mitchell Harman
1Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York 10003, USA. hhecht@aol.com
The American Journal of Cardiology
|July 31, 2003
Abstract:
The comparative effects of more versus less aggressive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering (to =80 vs >80 mg/dl) on calcified coronary plaque progression by electron beam tomography were evaluated in 182 consecutive asymptomatic patients after 1.2 years of treatment with statins alone or in combination with niacin. Despite the greater improvement in lipids in the =80 versus >80 mg/dl groups, there were no differences in calcified plaque progression (9.3%/year vs 9.1%/year). We conclude that, with respect to LDL cholesterol lowering, "lower is better" is not supported by changes in calcified plaque progression.
![Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT)](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F3777.jpg&w=3840&q=50)

