Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standards and interpretive issues in lung function testing.

Robert O Crapo1, Robert L Jensen

  • 1Pulmonary Division, LDS Hospital, 8th Avenue and C Street, Salt Lake City UT 84143, USA. ldrcrapo@ihc.com

Respiratory Care
|August 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brief Report: The Implications of Removing Race From Interpretation of Pulmonary Function Among Persons With or Without HIV.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2025
Same author

The implications of removing race from interpretation of pulmonary function among persons with or without HIV.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2024
Same author

Effect of barometric pressure on single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.

Respiratory physiology & neurobiology·2022
Same author

Diffusing Capacity and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2022
Same author

Haemoglobin as a biomarker for clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

ERJ open research·2021
Same author

Lung function in men with and without HIV.

AIDS (London, England)·2020
Same journal

Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Comparative Evaluation of Risk Scores for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications".

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Stable COPD: A Multimodal Assessment of Diaphragmatic and Cough-Related Impairment.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Flow Asynchronies During Pressure Support Ventilation in Children: A Bench Model Study.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Inspiratory Effort Assessment Using the Occlusion Pressure-Derived Tension-Time Index.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Clinical Usage of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Across Disease Categories and Care Settings: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Devices as Analyzed in Lung Models: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Peak Expiratory Flow Data.

Respiratory care·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing pulmonary function tests ensures accuracy and minimizes errors in diagnosis and treatment. Following established guidelines increases confidence in test outcomes for better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Clinical Measurement

Background:

  • Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are crucial for diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases.
  • Inconsistent PFT techniques can lead to significant diagnostic and therapeutic errors.
  • Standardization of PFTs is essential for reliable and reproducible results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the rationale behind standardizing pulmonary function tests.
  • To explore the limitations of current standardization protocols.
  • To provide practical recommendations for enhancing confidence in PFT results through standardization.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and guidelines on pulmonary function testing.
  • Analysis of factors influencing PFT accuracy and reproducibility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of practical suggestions for implementing standardized PFT procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Standardized techniques are vital for minimizing errors in PFT interpretation.
    • Adherence to established standards improves the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of PFTs.
    • Practical application of standards can significantly increase confidence in test results.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardization of pulmonary function tests is critical for accurate patient assessment.
    • Implementing standardized PFTs reduces the likelihood of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
    • Following best practices in PFTs enhances clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.