Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally invasive fusion: summary statement.

Richard D Guyer, Kevin T Foley, Frank M Phillips

    Spine
    |August 5, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Radiographic Evaluation of a Modular Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Cage: Subsidence and Segmental Lordosis.

    Cureus·2026
    Same author

    Microsurgical Resection of a Type IVb Perimedullary Spinal Arteriovenous Fistula Supplied by Artery of Adamkiewicz: A 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

    Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)·2026
    Same author

    Dysphagia rates between long-segment anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.

    Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
    Same author

    Predictors of long-term myelopathy relief in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy following surgery: a Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

    Neurosurgical focus·2026
    Same author

    What determines patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 2 lumbar spondylolisthesis? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

    Neurosurgical focus·2026
    Same author

    Is patient satisfaction static at 5 years after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

    Neurosurgical focus·2026
    Same journal

    Full-Body Radiographic Imaging-Based Thigh Muscle Measurement for Sarcopenia: Association with Functional Assessments and Sagittal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

    Spine·2026
    Same journal

    Biomechanical Effects of A Unilateral Transforaminal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Decompression: A Cadaveric Study.

    Spine·2026
    Same journal

    Reply to the Letter to the Editor: "Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Statin Usage Are Associated With Rates of Pseudarthrosis Following Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion".

    Spine·2026
    Same journal

    Antipsychotic Medications are Associated with Higher Rates of Healthcare Utilization, Complications, Opioid Prescriptions, and Subsequent Cervical Surgery after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

    Spine·2026
    Same journal

    Long-Term Mechanical Complications After Lumbar Fusion in Patients Receiving Tirzepatide vs Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

    Spine·2026
    Same journal

    Extended Postoperative Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

    Spine·2026
    See all related articles

    Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) aims for less tissue manipulation than open surgery. Proving MIS safety, effectiveness, and an acceptable learning curve is crucial for widespread adoption.

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical Innovation
    • Medical Technology

    Background:

    • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) involves smaller incisions and less tissue manipulation compared to open surgery.
    • The primary goal of MIS is to reduce patient morbidity while achieving comparable surgical outcomes.
    • Widespread adoption of MIS necessitates validation of its safety, effectiveness, and learning curve.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the ideal characteristics and requirements for successful minimally invasive surgery.
    • To emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up and outcome measures in assessing MIS.
    • To address the need for specialized skills beyond traditional open surgery for MIS proficiency.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of minimally invasive versus open surgical approaches.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of requirements for surgeon proficiency and training in MIS.
  • Emphasis on long-term outcome assessment and patient safety protocols.

    • Main Results:

    • MIS ideally achieves the same goals as open surgery with reduced surrounding tissue manipulation.
    • Effectiveness of MIS is contingent on not compromising the surgeon's ability to perform the operation successfully.
    • Acceptable learning curves and specialized skills are critical for MIS adoption.

    Conclusions:

    • Minimally invasive surgery must be as effective as open surgery, not just less invasive.
    • Long-term data and outcome measures are essential to validate MIS safety and efficacy.
    • Addressing the learning curve and skill acquisition is paramount for the broader implementation of MIS.