Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

05:17
Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral-Approach Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Biomechanical Effects of A Unilateral Transforaminal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Decompression: A Cadaveric Study
Shahed M Elhamdani1,2, Aidan K Copinga3, Owen G Corcoran3
1Neurosurgery. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Spine
|June 25, 2026
Summary
Even minimal resection of the superior articular process during transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery can alter spinal kinematics. This cadaveric study found significant changes in range of motion and stiffness with progressive superior articular process removal.
Area of Science:
- Spinal biomechanics
- Minimally invasive spine surgery
- Spinal kinematics
Background:
- Transforaminal endoscopic decompression is a less destabilizing alternative to posterior approaches.
- Limited biomechanical data exists on the segmental stability effects of stepwise superior articular process resection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify biomechanical changes in spinal kinematics with increasing degrees of unilateral superior articular process resection.
- To evaluate the impact of transforaminal endoscopic approaches on lumbar spine stability.
Main Methods:
- Cadaveric biomechanics study using six lumbar spine specimens.
- Tested range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and neutral zone stiffness (NZ stiffness) in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion.
- Progressively resected the superior articular process (SAP) in four increments.
Main Results:
- Significant increases in lateral bending ROM and decreases in stiffness occurred after the first resection pass.
- Significant increases in neutral zone in flexion/extension were observed at the second and fourth passes.
- One-way ANOVA indicated significant changes in ROM, NZ, and NZ stiffness with SAP resection.
Conclusions:
- Even minimal superior articular process resection significantly alters spine kinematics, affecting ROM and stiffness.
- While changes may not be clinically significant, this cadaveric model represents a worst-case scenario for biomechanical alterations.