Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast optimization and scan timing for single and multidetector-row computed tomography.

James A Brink1

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
|August 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How I Do It: Advancing Point-of-Care US in a Large Hospital Setting.

Radiology·2025
Same author

Enhancing MRI efficiency in musculoskeletal examinations: Impact of optimized facility design and workflow optimization efforts.

European journal of radiology·2025
Same author

Imaging in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2025
Same author

Preparing the next generation of healthcare leaders through a longitudinal management and leadership training program for radiology residents.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2025
Same author

Expert panel on monitoring radiation doses from recurrent medical diagnostic procedures: Sixth Gilbert W. Beebe Webinar.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2025
Same author

Imaging in malignant peritoneal neoplasms.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2024
Same journal

Low-Field Neuroimaging: Opportunities and Limitations.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Performance of Routine Abdominal MRI for Detecting Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in ADPKD.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI With Diffusion and Clinicopathologic Features for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis and Spine Fractures Using Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Accuracy and Variability of Spatial Localization of Infarct Core Predicted by CT Perfusion.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Acute Biliary Disorders and Complications.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
See all related articles

Optimizing contrast media for computed tomography (CT) involves patient factors and injection techniques. High contrast concentration and rapid imaging enhance diagnostic detail, especially for liver and vascular studies.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Pharmacokinetics

Background:

  • Computed tomography (CT) imaging relies on contrast media, whose effectiveness is influenced by complex pharmacokinetic factors.
  • Patient-specific variables (age, weight, health status) and contrast injection parameters (volume, concentration, rate) significantly impact image enhancement.
  • The liver's dual blood supply presents unique challenges for contrast material management in CT, requiring precise timing to avoid equilibrium phases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the pharmacokinetic interrelationships governing contrast media use in computed tomography (CT) imaging.
  • To identify key factors influencing contrast enhancement, particularly in body CT and liver imaging.
  • To provide guidance on optimizing contrast administration for improved diagnostic accuracy in CT angiography and multiphasic imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of pharmacokinetic principles related to contrast media administration in CT.
  • Evaluation of patient-related factors influencing contrast enhancement.
  • Assessment of contrast injection parameters, including volume, concentration, injection rate, and technique (uniphasic vs. multiphasic).

Main Results:

  • Hepatic enhancement magnitude is primarily determined by iodinated contrast material accumulation in the extravascular space, independent of CT scanner speed.
  • Injection duration is the key determinant for the onset of the equilibrium phase; high injection rates necessitate appropriate contrast volumes.
  • Modifying total iodine dose is best achieved by altering contrast concentration, with high concentrations (400 mg iodine/ml) beneficial for heavier patients or high-detail vascular imaging.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal contrast enhancement in CT depends on a balance of patient factors and precise injection techniques.
  • High contrast concentrations and rapid imaging are crucial for achieving superior arterial enhancement and diagnostic detail in CT angiography and multiphasic studies.
  • Understanding these pharmacokinetic principles allows for tailored contrast media strategies to maximize diagnostic yield in various CT applications.