Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Liver imaging with multidetector helical computed tomography.

Rendon C Nelson1, Audrey L Spielmann

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. nelso017@mc.duke.edu

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
|August 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HSP90-Specific nIR Probe Identifies Aggressive Prostate Cancers: Translation from Preclinical Models to a Human Phase I Study.

Molecular cancer therapeutics·2021
Same author

Dual-Energy CT Vital Iodine Tumor Burden for Response Assessment in Patients With Metastatic GIST Undergoing TKI Therapy: Comparison With Standard CT and FDG PET/CT Criteria.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2021
Same author

Comparison of clinical efficacy, subjective user experience, and safety for two different core biopsy needles, the Achieve® and Marquee®.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2021
Same author

Can procedure time for paracentesis be optimized based on bottle selection?

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2021
Same author

Hemodialysis catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium for computed tomography angiography.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2021
Same author

Variability of quantitative measurements of metastatic liver lesions: a multi-radiation-dose-level and multi-reader comparison.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2020
Same journal

Low-Field Neuroimaging: Opportunities and Limitations.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Performance of Routine Abdominal MRI for Detecting Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in ADPKD.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI With Diffusion and Clinicopathologic Features for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis and Spine Fractures Using Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Accuracy and Variability of Spatial Localization of Infarct Core Predicted by CT Perfusion.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Acute Biliary Disorders and Complications.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
See all related articles

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) enhances liver lesion detection and characterization. Understanding contrast enhancement patterns across different phases is key for accurate diagnosis and optimized MDCT liver protocols.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Hepatology

Background:

  • Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) offers speed and flexibility for liver imaging.
  • MDCT is crucial for detecting and characterizing focal liver lesions.
  • Understanding contrast enhancement dynamics is vital for interpreting liver scans.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss liver enhancement phases after iodinated contrast administration.
  • To describe enhancement patterns of liver lesions during different phases.
  • To propose MDCT liver imaging protocol guidelines and contrast delivery principles.

Main Methods:

  • Review of MDCT liver imaging techniques.
  • Analysis of contrast enhancement patterns in various liver lesions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of protocol recommendations for MDCT liver examinations.

    • Main Results:

    • MDCT provides detailed visualization of liver anatomy and pathology.
    • Distinct enhancement patterns are observed for different focal liver lesions across vascular phases.
    • Optimized protocols improve lesion detection and characterization accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • MDCT is a powerful tool for liver lesion evaluation.
    • Knowledge of enhancement phases and lesion patterns aids diagnosis.
    • Standardized MDCT protocols enhance diagnostic performance in liver imaging.