Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Actively tracking 'passive' stability in a ball bouncing task.

Aymar de Rugy1, Kunlin Wei, Hermann Müller

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, 266 Recreation Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. aug3@psu.edu

Brain Research
|August 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

An amino acid insertion in the PHI loop of the VP2 capsid protein of serotype 1 infectious bursal disease virus deeply modifies its antigenicity and abrogates its propagation into B cells.

Veterinary research·2026
Same author

The earlier you know, the smoother you act: anticipatory control in solo and dyadic juggling.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Virtual flying experience changes neural responses to seeing wings.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

A 3-DoF Wrist Control Based on Natural Arm Movements Outperforms Current Myoelectric Prosthesis in VR.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Targeting neurodevelopmental miR132-3p promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Variability in acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition across adulthood in Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 knockout mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Transcriptome-guided modeling reveals insulin-related metabolic dysfunction in SCA3 mouse cerebellum.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Electroacupuncture treatment enhances hippocampal growth hormone level and restores mitochondrial function in vascular dementia rats.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Human ball bouncing control relies on active adjustments to a passive stability system. By altering racket timing, performers quickly regain stable ball amplitudes after perturbations.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human-robot interaction
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Rhythmic ball bouncing demonstrates passive stability when impacts occur during the ball's decelerating upward phase.
  • Previous research suggested human performance aligns with this passive stability, requiring minimal explicit error correction.
  • However, active control mechanisms are necessary to adapt to perturbations and maintain stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the active control strategies humans employ to maintain rhythmic ball bouncing stability under perturbations.
  • To determine how subjects attune to passive stability when faced with unexpected changes in ball dynamics.
  • To model the neural and mechanical processes involved in adapting ball-bouncing behavior.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Six subjects performed rhythmic ball bouncing in a virtual reality environment.
  • Perturbations were introduced by altering the ball-racket coefficient of restitution every fifth bounce, causing unexpected amplitude changes.
  • Kinematic analysis and a neural oscillator model were used to analyze control strategies and simulate results.

    • Main Results:

    • Subjects compensated for perturbations within 2-3 bouncing cycles, restoring initial ball amplitudes.
    • Racket period adjustments ensured impacts occurred within the passively stable phase, indicated by negative racket acceleration.
    • A computational model simulating a neural oscillator controlling a mechanical actuator accurately reproduced experimental findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Human rhythmic ball bouncing involves active control that complements passive stability mechanisms.
    • Adaptation to perturbations is achieved by adjusting the timing (period) of the neural oscillator based on perceived ball velocity.
    • The findings provide insights into the interplay between neural control and biomechanical dynamics in motor tasks.