Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions.

Virginia G Cooper1, Patricia A Zapf

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Alabama, USA.

Law and Human Behavior
|August 15, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The MacCAT-CA and the ECST-R in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations: A Critical Review and Practical Implications.

Journal of personality assessment·2021
Same author

Competence to stand trial and criminalization: an overview of the research.

CNS spectrums·2019
Same author

Using the Internet for collateral information in forensic mental health evaluations.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2018
Same author

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) and competency to stand trial (CST): Suggestions for a 'best practices' approach to forensic evaluation.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2017
Same author

Psychiatric patients' comprehension of Miranda rights.

Law and human behavior·2007
Same author

Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings.

Law and human behavior·2007

Competency to stand trial assessments by clinicians appear unbiased. Key predictors of competency decisions were clinical diagnoses and employment status, not demographic factors, suggesting decisions focus on functional ability.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Legal Psychology
  • Clinical Assessment

Background:

  • Clinicians have considerable discretion in competency to stand trial evaluations.
  • Ensuring unbiased decision-making in these assessments is crucial for legal and ethical reasons.
  • Understanding the influence of various factors on competency decisions is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predictive efficiency of clinical, criminological, and sociodemographic variables in competency to stand trial assessments.
  • To determine if bias exists in clinical decision-making during competency evaluations.
  • To identify which variables significantly contribute to a clinician's decision regarding a defendant's competency.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 468 criminal defendants referred for competency evaluations was analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study examined the predictive power of clinical diagnostic variables, criminological factors, and sociodemographic data.
  • Statistical analysis was used to identify significant predictors of competency decisions.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical diagnostic variables were significant predictors of competency decisions.
    • Employment status also emerged as a significant predictor.
    • Sociodemographic and criminological variables did not significantly predict competency decisions, suggesting a lack of bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Competency to stand trial assessment decisions appear to be largely unbiased.
    • Decisions are primarily based on a defendant's functional ability, as indicated by clinical diagnoses and employment status.
    • The findings support the reliability of clinical judgment in competency evaluations when focused on relevant functional capacities.