Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A nonlinear mixed model framework for item response theory.

Frank Rijmen1, Francis Tuerlinckx, Paul De Boeck

  • 1Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. frank.rijmen@psy.kuleuven.ac.be

Psychological Methods
|August 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Friends to Feelings: Negative Peer Influence on Student Boredom and the Moderating Roles of Teacher-Student Relationship Quality and Cognitive Ability.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2026
Same author

Remembering affect between moments: assessing peak-end effects in continuous affect measures.

Cognition & emotion·2026
Same author

Love in motion: Bringing temporal and interpersonal dynamics into the formula of love.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Computational protocol for hierarchical Bayesian modeling of perception and generalization in fear conditioning.

STAR protocols·2026
Same author

Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Asymptotically Correct Person Fit z-Statistics For the Rasch Testlet Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Addressing selective reporting bias in meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes: A tutorial in R.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneous variance models with Gaussian processes.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

This study unifies item response theory (IRT) models and nonlinear mixed models, demonstrating their formal equivalence. This framework clarifies relationships between IRT models and facilitates their extension for analyzing clustered data.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Mixed models account for dependencies within clusters using random effects.
  • Item response theory (IRT) models use latent person variables to explain response dependencies.
  • Existing IRT models can be complex and difficult to extend.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the formal equivalence between common item response theory (IRT) models and nonlinear mixed models.
  • To present a unifying framework for understanding and extending various IRT models.
  • To illustrate the practical application of this framework using a self-report anger study.

Main Methods:

  • Formulating diverse IRT models as specific instances of nonlinear mixed models.
  • Assuming a distribution for latent variables in IRT models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing a unifying statistical framework for model comparison and adaptation.

    • Main Results:

    • Established the formal equivalence between IRT models and nonlinear mixed models.
    • Showcased how the unifying framework explicitly defines relations between different IRT models.
    • Demonstrated the straightforward adaptation and extension of existing IRT models within this framework.

    Conclusions:

    • The integration of IRT and nonlinear mixed models provides a powerful, unified approach.
    • This framework enhances the understanding, adaptability, and extensibility of IRT models.
    • The approach is effective for analyzing psychological data, such as self-reported anger.