Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does a dose-response relationship reduce sensitivity to hidden bias?

Paul R Rosenbaum1

  • 1Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6340, USA. rosenbaum@stat.wharton.upenn.edu

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|August 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

STRONGER INSTRUMENTS VIA INTEGER PROGRAMMING IN AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF LATE PRETERM BIRTH OUTCOMES.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

Improving the Evaluation of Low-Volume Hospitals.

Medical care·2026
Same author

Assessing Hospital Surgical Quality.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2025
Same author

Grading Hospitals Using Multivariate Matching.

Medical care·2025
Same author

Optimal refinement of strata to balance covariates.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

Exposure to Operative Anesthesia in Childhood and Subsequent Neurobehavioral Diagnoses: A Natural Experiment Using Appendectomy.

Anesthesiology·2024
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Addressing the influence of unmeasured confounding in observational studies with time-to-event outcomes: a semiparametric sensitivity analysis approach.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

A dose-response relationship does not definitively prove causality. This study shows that its presence or absence can be analyzed to determine sensitivity to hidden bias, regardless of the observed treatment effect.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • The dose-response relationship is a commonly cited criterion for inferring causality between a treatment and an observed outcome.
  • However, established theory and examples demonstrate that causality can exist without a dose-response relationship, and biases can create a spurious dose-response relationship.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the role of dose-response relationships in establishing causality.
  • To investigate how dose-response relationships influence sensitivity to hidden bias.
  • To demonstrate methods for assessing bias sensitivity using available data.

Main Methods:

  • The study examines the theoretical implications of dose-response relationships on causal inference.
  • It proposes analytical approaches to quantify the impact of hidden bias.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A real-world example involving cytogenetic damage in painters is used for illustration.

    • Main Results:

    • A dose-response relationship does not inherently reduce sensitivity to hidden bias.
    • The presence or absence of a dose-response relationship's impact on bias can be determined through data analysis.
    • Studies lacking a dose-response relationship may be less susceptible to bias than those with one, which can also be assessed.

    Conclusions:

    • The presence or absence of a dose-response relationship is not a definitive indicator of causality.
    • Data-driven analysis is crucial for assessing the impact of hidden bias, irrespective of dose-response patterns.
    • Causal inference requires careful consideration of potential biases beyond simple dose-response trends.