Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of adjusted attributable risk estimators.

O Gefeller1

  • 1Abteilung Medizinische Statistik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany.

Statistics in Medicine
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends and current spectrum of contact allergy in Central Europe: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2007-2018.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

The Garment Protection Factor: further advances in labelling sun-protective clothing.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Memorandum "Open Metadata". Open Access to Documentation Forms and Item Catalogs in Healthcare.

Methods of information in medicine·2015
Same author

The evolution of boosting algorithms. From machine learning to statistical modelling.

Methods of information in medicine·2014
Same author

Extending statistical boosting. An overview of recent methodological developments.

Methods of information in medicine·2014
Same author

Risk factors of polysensitization to contact allergens.

The British journal of dermatology·2013

This study compares methods for estimating attributable risk with confounding. Case load weighting maximum likelihood estimators are recommended for large sample sizes in epidemiological research.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Attributable risk estimation is crucial in epidemiology for understanding disease burden.
  • Confounding and effect modification present significant challenges in accurately estimating attributable risk.
  • Existing adjustment methods require careful consideration of the underlying statistical models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare different adjustment methods for attributable risk estimation.
  • To evaluate the performance of these methods under confounding and effect modification.
  • To identify the most reliable estimator for attributable risk in practical epidemiological studies.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted to compare various adjustment methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The unrestricted multinomial sampling model was used for the simulations.
  • Performance was evaluated based on statistical properties and accuracy of estimates.

    • Main Results:

    • The maximum likelihood estimator using 'case load weighting' of stratum-specific estimates performed best overall.
    • This method is recommended for practical situations with sufficiently large sample sizes.
    • Other adjusted estimators showed a strong dependence on the multinomial model's structure.

    Conclusions:

    • The 'case load weighting' maximum likelihood estimator is a robust choice for attributable risk estimation.
    • Researchers should consider sample size and model assumptions when selecting an adjustment method.
    • Accurate attributable risk estimation is vital for public health interventions and policy making.