Related Experiment Videos
Selection and Evaluation Guidelines for Clinical Education Settings in Athletic Training
Thomas G. Weidner1, Tim Laurent
1Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
Journal of Athletic Training
|August 26, 2003
Summary
This study developed 12 new standards and 31 criteria for evaluating athletic training clinical education settings. These guidelines aim to improve the quality of athletic training programs and student experiences.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Allied Health Education
- Clinical Education Standards
Background:
- Clinical education is crucial for athletic training program success.
- Existing evaluation methods require refinement for athletic training settings.
- A validated framework for physical therapy settings was adapted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate standards and criteria for selecting and evaluating athletic training clinical education settings.
- To create practical evaluation tools for stakeholders.
- To enhance the quality of athletic training clinical education.
Main Methods:
- Systematic adaptation of 20 physical therapy clinical education standards.
- Survey process involving program directors, clinical instructors, and students.
- Analysis of respondent critiques and ratings for relevance and practicality.
Main Results:
- A final set of 12 standards and 31 criteria were accepted.
- Student evaluation forms include 23 criteria linked to the accepted standards.
- Key standards encompass learning environment, program planning, ethical standards, administrative support, and clinical education coordinator roles.
Conclusions:
- The 12 standards and 31 criteria serve as guidelines, not minimum requirements, for assessing clinical settings.
- These tools can inform impressions of specific clinical settings and general clinical education requirements.
- Further research should explore gender and ethnic group perceptions and develop clinical instruction standards.