Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standards in medical record keeping.

Robin Mann1, John Williams

  • 1Health Informatics Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London. robin.mann@rcplondon.ac.uk

Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|August 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Audiologic Assessment and Management of Teprotumumab-Associated Ototoxicity: An Updated Narrative Review.

Audiology research·2026
Same author

Respiratory viral infection is associated with increased <i>Pseudomonas</i> abundance in the cystic fibrosis airway.

ERJ open research·2026
Same author

Self-Perceived Health Status Among Patients With and Without TBI: An All of Us Analysis.

The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation·2026
Same author

California Prescribed Fire Monitoring Program: dataset 2019-2024.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Enhancing Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging With Differential Transformer.

Journal of biophotonics·2026
Same author

Surgical site infection definitions consensus: a first step toward improving prevention in veterinary medicine.

American journal of veterinary research·2025
Same journal

Finerenone Exposure and Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and predictive factors of chronic kidney disease among individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors: A multicenter cross sectional study, North East Ethiopia.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Authors' response to Dr Lucy Williams' letter to the Editor: 'Life expectancy of UK physicians in the early 21st century: An analysis of 1,000 fellows from the Royal College of Physicians' Munk's Roll'.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Resident doctor workforce wellbeing worldwide: lessons between the United Kingdom and Australia.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Premature ventricular complexes.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): diagnosis and management for the general physician.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Improving the quality of medical records is crucial for patient care and realizing the full benefits of electronic health record systems. Evidence-based standards for record keeping are being developed to enhance patient outcomes and clinician performance.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Record Keeping
  • Patient Care Quality

Background:

  • Medical records are vital for patient care, but quality varies significantly in England and Wales.
  • The National Health Service (NHS) is undergoing a major transition to computerize medical records.
  • Current paper record quality issues may hinder the full realization of electronic health record benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the variability in medical record and discharge summary quality.
  • To develop evidence-based standards for medical record keeping and structure.
  • To improve patient outcomes and clinician performance through better record management.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on medical record quality and structure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of evidence-based standards for record keeping by the RCP Health Informatics Unit (HIU).
  • Release of a draft of these standards for consultation.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified significant variability in the quality of medical records and discharge summaries.
    • Recognized the need for improved paper record quality to support computerization.
    • Initiated the development of structured, evidence-based record-keeping standards.

    Conclusions:

    • Improving the quality and structure of medical records is essential for effective patient care.
    • Individual health professionals hold responsibility for enhancing record quality.
    • The developed standards aim to improve patient outcomes and healthcare professionals' performance.