Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practical principles & practical judgment.

O O'Neill

    The Hastings Center Report
    |August 30, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Insurance and genetics: the current state of play.

    The Modern law review·2003
    Same author

    Some limits of informed consent.

    Journal of medical ethics·2003
    Same author

    Use of decompressive craniectomy after severe head trauma.

    AORN journal·2002
    Same author

    The efficacy of oral analgesia for postoperative pain.

    The British journal of theatre nursing : NATNews : the official journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses·1999
    Same author

    Endovascular treatment of traumatic dural sinus thrombosis: case report.

    Neurosurgery·1998
    Same author

    Genetic information and insurance: some ethical issues.

    Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·1997
    Same journal

    Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    See all related articles

    General principles are crucial for moral deliberation, but they do not provide step-by-step instructions. Instead, they establish broad moral requirements that guide decision-making in specific situations.

    Area of Science:

    • Moral Philosophy
    • Ethics
    • Decision-Making Theory

    Background:

    • The role of general principles in moral reasoning is often debated.
    • Some argue principles are too abstract to be practically useful.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To clarify the function of general principles in moral deliberation.
    • To address misunderstandings regarding the application of moral principles.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of moral principles.
    • Examination of the relationship between principles and practical moral judgment.

    Main Results:

    • General principles function as broad moral requirements, not as algorithms for action.
    • Individuals must interpret and apply principles to specific cases.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

    Conclusions:

    • Moral deliberation requires crafting context-specific responses that align with general moral commitments.
    • Principles guide, but do not dictate, moral actions.