Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System
Published on: May 5, 2022
Evaluation of root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips
H Ishikawa1, N Sawada, C Kobayashi
1Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. h-ishikawa.endo@tmd.ac.jp
Aim:
To evaluate and compare the efficiency of root-end preparations using ultrasonic retrotips coated with diamond and zirconium nitride.
Methodology:
Eighty-five extracted single-rooted teeth were root filled, and then resected 3 mm from their apices. Root-end cavities were prepared with KiS (zirconium nitride-coated retrotip), CT-5 (stainless steel tip) or diamond-coated (DC) ultrasonic retrotips, and 10 teeth served as controls. Thirty teeth were used for evaluation of the time required to prepare the root-end cavity, the number of microcracks produced on the resected surface and the number of dentinal tubule openings on the root-canal wall using scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. A further 55 teeth were used for evaluation of dye penetration following filling of the root-end cavities with Super EBA. The degree of dye penetration in millimetres was measured under the microscope after 7 days of immersion in India ink. Statistical analyses were performed using the one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's F-test as the post hoc test.
Results:
There was no significant difference in the number of microcracks and dentinal tubule openings present in the root apices prepared by the three retrotips. The time required for root-end cavity preparation using the DC retrotip was significantly less than that using the other groups (P<0.01). Positive controls showed dye penetration throughout the length of the root-end cavity, and negative controls showed no dye penetration. There was no significant difference between the three experimental groups in dye penetration.
Conclusions:
In this laboratory study, the time required to prepare root-end cavities using KiS retrotips was the same as that using CT-5 retrotips, and longer than that using DC retrotips. There was no significant difference in the number of microcracks or dye penetration between the three kinds of retrotips.

