Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bureaucratizing suicide.

S J Youngner1

  • 1Case Western Reserve University, Center for Biomedical Ethics, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4976, USA. sxy2@po.cwru.edu

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law : an Official Law Review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law
|September 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

One or two types of death? Attitudes of health professionals towards brain death and donation after circulatory death in three countries.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2011
Same author

"Allow natural death" is not equivalent to " do not resuscitate": a response.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

Should individuals choose their definition of death?

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

Transfer of the hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient to the intensive care unit: does it really matter?

Bone marrow transplantation·2005
Same author

Philosophical debates about the definition of death: who cares?

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

Thoughts of hastening death among hospice patients.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2000
Same journal

Difficulties in attorneys' before/after questions in child sexual abuse trials.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2026
Same journal

Four (and a Half) Preregistered Failures to Replicate the Weapon Focus Effect in Online Samples.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2025
Same journal

Diversion as a Pathway to Improving Service Utilization Among At-Risk Youth.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2024
Same journal

The Critical Case File Approach: A Novel Tool for Critically Analyzing Mixed-Method Data as Exemplified in a Juvenile Legal Setting.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2024
Same journal

Recommendations for the Use of Telepsychology in Psychology-Law Practice and Research: A Statement by American Psychology-Law Society (APA Division 41).

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2024
Same journal

Identification and Incidence of Child Maltreatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2023
See all related articles

The Guidelines for Assessing Mental Capacity and Impaired Judgment need improvement. Key areas for enhancement include defining capacity, acknowledging evaluator values, and prioritizing assessment methods to avoid burdening patients.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Legal Medicine
  • Psychiatry

Background:

  • The Guidelines for Assessing Mental Capacity and Impaired Judgment offer valuable support.
  • However, current frameworks may present limitations in practical application.
  • Ensuring patient-centered care requires continuous refinement of assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the Guidelines for Assessing Mental Capacity and Impaired Judgment.
  • To identify specific areas where the guidelines fall short.
  • To propose improvements for more effective and ethical patient assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Content analysis of the Guidelines for Assessing Mental Capacity and Impaired Judgment.
  • Review of existing literature on mental capacity assessment.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical and practical critique of guideline components.

    • Main Results:

    • The term "capacity" is inadequately defined and explained within the guidelines.
    • The influence of the evaluator's personal values is not sufficiently addressed.
    • Over-reliance on checklists and formal tests, without clear prioritization, is noted.

    Conclusions:

    • The current guidelines require revision to improve clarity and ethical considerations.
    • A more nuanced approach is needed, balancing formal assessment with clinical judgment.
    • Refinements are crucial to prevent undue burden on vulnerable patients, particularly those nearing the end of life.