Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026
A Preclinical Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Hemorrhage Contusion and Neuroinflammation
Published on: June 10, 2020
Fatal firearm wounds: a clinicopathologic study
B D Bhana1, G M Kirk, M A Dada
1Department of Forensic Medicine University of Pretoria Institute of Pathology PO Box 2034 Pretoria 0001 South Africa. babita@med.up.ac.za
Insights
Physicians in South Africa often misidentify gunshot wounds, leading to missed injuries. Improved medical training is crucial for accurate documentation and interpretation of firearm-related trauma.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Pathology
- Trauma Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Firearm-related injuries represent a significant cause of death and disability in South Africa.
- Accurate clinical assessment and documentation of gunshot wounds are vital for patient management and legal proceedings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of clinical documentation and interpretation of firearm-related injuries in fatal cases.
- To identify discrepancies between clinical assessments and autopsy findings in gunshot wound cases.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective autopsy study of 322 fatal gunshot wound cases from a central mortuary in Durban (July 1998 - June 1999).
- Comparison of pre-mortem clinical assessments with postmortem autopsy findings.
- Exclusion of 28 cases due to surgical alterations precluding wound evaluation.
Main Results:
- Clinicians correctly identified the number of wounds in 50.7% and the position in 55.1% of cases.
- Entry and exit wounds were correctly identified in only 36.1% of cases.
- A total of 504 (48.3%) wounds were missed during clinical assessment, predominantly on the upper limbs (25%).
Conclusions:
- Physicians in South Africa demonstrate inadequate documentation and interpretation of gunshot wounds.
- This inaccuracy can negatively impact patient treatment and have medicolegal implications.
- Enhanced undergraduate and postgraduate medical education is recommended to improve the identification, interpretation, and documentation of firearm wounds.
Abstract:
Firearm-related injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in South Africa. This retrospective autopsy study included all firearm-related fatalities seen at a central mortuary in Durban. These cases had initially been assessed by a clinician before death, from July 1998 to June 1999.A total of 322 cases of fatal gunshot wounds were reviewed. Medical records and postmortem findings were compared by data capture onto a spreadsheet. Twenty-eight cases were excluded because of surgical alteration of the wounds, making autopsy evaluation impossible. In 50.7% of cases, the number of wounds was correctly identified and in 55.1% the position was correctly identified. In only 36.1% of cases were the entry and exit wounds correctly identified. The total number of missed wounds was 504 (48.3% of cases). The majority of missed wounds were on the upper limbs (25%), with the anterior trunk (21.8%) and lower limbs (18.5%) making up the remainder. This study demonstrates that physicians in South Africa do not adequately document and interpret gunshot wounds, which may influence the treatment of the patient and have medicolegal consequences. Emphasis should be placed on undergraduate and postgraduate teaching for physicians to correctly identify, interpret, and document firearm wounds.
