Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
Published on: May 10, 2022
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Computed Tomography for Segmentation-Based Cavity Volume Measurements in
Vasiliki Chatzaraki1, Dominic Gascho1, Michael J Thali1
1Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse, Zurich.
None:
Gelatin-based phantoms are commonly used as soft-tissue simulants in wound ballistics research, yet MRI has not previously been applied for volumetric analysis in this setting. This study compared permanent cavity volumes measured on CT using soft and hard-kernel reconstructions (CTsoft, CThard) and MRI using 3D T1 and T2-weighted sequences (MRIT1, MRIT2) in 20 gelatin head phantoms shot with different ammunition types. Volumes were segmented manually and evaluated using correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. CT-MRI comparisons showed small mean biases (-1.07 to 3.03 cm3) but wide 95% limits of agreement (LoA), ranging from -22.1 to 19.9 cm3 depending on the modality pair, corresponding to potential deviations of approximately ±90% to 100% of a typical cavity volume. The closest agreement was observed for CThard-MRIT1 and CTsoft-MRIT2, while MRIT1-CTsoft exhibited the widest LoA. Metallic fragments did not impair segmentation, whereas air-filled regions produced susceptibility-related signal voids on MRI. Overall, CT and MRI both allow reliable visualization and measurement of permanent wound channels, but variability between modalities limits their interchangeability for precise volumetry in individual cases.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

