Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Group caregiver language checklist.

M E Pearson1, D Shelton, A A Pearson

  • 1Mankato State University, MN 56002-8400.

Clinics in Communication Disorders
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrostatic frequency reduction: A negative stiffness mechanism for measuring dissipation in a mechanical oscillator at low frequency.

The Review of scientific instruments·2021
Same author

Functional Evaluation of Three Manure-Borne Indicator Bacteria Release Models with Multiyear Field Experiment Data.

Water, air, and soil pollution·2018
Same author

Rapid on-site evaluation facilitated the diagnosis of a rare case of Talaromyces marneffei infection.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2018
Same author

A retrospective 3-year study of salivary gland FNAC with categorisation using the Milan reporting system.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2018
Same author

Castleman's disease diagnosed on fine needle aspiration cytology: A multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2018
Same author

Angioimmunoblastic T Cell lymphoma mimics reactive lymphoid tissue on cytomorphology: A multimodality approach utilising cytology, immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry to resolve this diagnostic dilemma.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2017
Same journal

Family-centered care: thriving in Hawaii under Part H.

Clinics in communication disorders·1994
Same journal

Recommendations for clinicians based on parents' experiences.

Clinics in communication disorders·1994
Same journal

Therapy at home: Vygotskian perspectives on parental involvement.

Clinics in communication disorders·1994
Same journal

Meeting the needs of the non-English-speaking parents of a communicatively disabled child.

Clinics in communication disorders·1994
Same journal

Preparing students to work with families: undergraduate and graduate education.

Clinics in communication disorders·1994
Same journal

Building partnerships with parents of school-age children with communication disorders.

Clinics in communication disorders·1994
See all related articles

Assessing the language environment in group settings is crucial for young children with language disabilities. The Group Language Environment Assessment (GLEA) procedure helps match environments to child needs and supports caregiver improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Child Development
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Early Childhood Education

Background:

  • Young children with language disabilities often attend group-care settings.
  • Evaluating the language environment in these settings is essential for targeted support.
  • Caregiver-child interactions significantly impact language development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and describe the Group Language Environment Assessment (GLEA) procedure.
  • To provide a tool for assessing the language environment in group settings for children with language disabilities.
  • To offer a basis for improving language environments and addressing individual child needs.

Main Methods:

  • The GLEA procedure is presented as a method for assessing caregiver language input in group settings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The assessment focuses on the quality and quantity of language interactions.
  • Information gathered can inform environmental modifications and caregiver coaching.

    • Main Results:

    • The GLEA provides a structured approach to evaluating language environments.
    • The assessment yields data to inform individualized support strategies.
    • It offers a framework for enhancing caregiver practices to better meet children's language needs.

    Conclusions:

    • The GLEA is a valuable tool for professionals working with young children with language disabilities in group settings.
    • Effective assessment of the language environment can lead to improved child outcomes.
    • The procedure supports a data-driven approach to intervention and environmental enhancement.