Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual imagery in cerebral visual dysfunction.

Giorgio Ganis1, William L Thompson, Fred W Mast

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. ganis@wjh.harvard.edu

Neurologic Clinics
|September 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal changes in mechanical pin prick sensitivity following high frequency induced sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways: A test re-test reliability study.

The journal of pain·2026
Same author

Cross-Modal Transfer as a Window Into the Investigation of Recent Stimulus and Response History in Perceptual Decision-Making.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Unilateral online ultrasound stimulation of early visual cortex suppresses responses to contralateral visual stimuli.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

Gaze patterns during visual mental imagery reflect part-based generation.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

ARTEM-IS for ERP: Agreed Reporting Template for EEG Methodology-International Standard for Event-Related Potential Experiments.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

The impact of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on alpha coherence and verbal divergent thinking.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

Sports Neurology.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Sports-Related Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Active Rehabilitation and Return to Play in Sports-Related Concussion.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Autonomic Assessment and Management in Sports-Related Concussion.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Management of Vestibular Symptoms in Sports-Related Concussion.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Neuropsychological Assessment in Sport-Related Concussion: Evidence, Controversies, and Clinical Applications.

Neurologic clinics·2026
See all related articles

Brain damage can cause various visual imagery deficits, but their link to specific brain locations is complex. Advanced neuroimaging offers deeper insights than studying patients alone.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • Brain damage can lead to diverse deficits in visual imagery.
  • The relationship between lesion location and imagery deficits is complex and not easily mapped.
  • Patient studies offer insights but have limitations due to compensatory mechanisms and unobservable deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the intricate relationship between brain structures and visual imagery processing.
  • To highlight the complementary roles of patient studies and neuroimaging in understanding mental imagery.
  • To caution against oversimplified models of imagery based on lesion data.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of dissociations in imagery performance following brain damage.
  • Interpretation of findings from neuroimaging techniques like Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Keywords:
Non-programmatic

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Observed deficits in visual imagery following brain damage are varied.
  • Neuroimaging provides valuable data on brain function during imagery tasks, complementing patient studies.
  • Simple models, such as those focusing solely on laterality, may be insufficient to explain complex imagery processing.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the neural basis of visual imagery requires integrating data from diverse methodologies.
  • The brain's processing of imagery is intricate, involving complex and subtle neural mechanisms.
  • Future research should move beyond simplistic models to capture the complexity of the mental imagery system.